By: Robert Moore, OSU Extension
As we all know, family farms often hold deep sentimental value. They are passed from generation to generation, with the hope that they will stay in the family. But without careful estate planning, these properties can become the subject of costly legal disputes—and even forced sales. A recent case from the Ohio Court of Appeals, Stephan v. Wacaster, is a textbook example of how inadequate planning can lead to the partition and sale of family land.
Don’t let this happen to the farm your family has worked for generations to build. You can still register for our Planning for the Future of Your Farm Workshop.
The Case: A Family Farm Divided
In Stephan v. Wacaster, the appeals court affirmed a decision forcing the partition[1] of a 95-acre farm in Miami County, Ohio. Here’s what happened:
Margaret Stephan, the original owner of the farm, left a will giving life estates to her two children, Connie Wacaster and DeWayne Stephan. Upon each of their deaths, the will directed that their respective shares would pass to their children. For DeWayne’s half, that meant his sons, Rick and Chris Stephan. For Connie’s half, her children, Tami Bodie and Todd Wacaster, would inherit.
Both Margaret and DeWayne passed away. Rick and Chris, now owning DeWayne’s one-half of the farm, filed a lawsuit seeking to partition the farm and divide the proceeds. Connie, still living and holding her life estate in half the property, objected. She argued that because she was still alive and held a life estate over the whole farm, the property couldn’t be partitioned until her death.
However, the court reached a different conclusion. It determined that Margaret’s will created a tenancy in common between Connie and DeWayne, rather than a joint survivorship. As a result, when DeWayne passed away, his sons, Rick and Chris, immediately inherited his half of the farm. This ownership gave them the legal right to seek partition of the entire property—even though Connie was still living there and held a life estate in her half.
If Rick and Chris move forward with partition, Connie will face a difficult choice: either purchase their half of the farm or allow the entire property to be sold—likely at public auction. If the property is sold, Connie may ultimately be forced to leave the farm altogether, losing not only her home but also the family legacy tied to the land.
Why This Happened: Poor Estate Planning
At the heart of this family dispute is a will that lacked clarity and failed to anticipate future complications. Margaret’s will did not create a survivorship interest for Connie and DeWayne, nor did it include restrictions to prevent partition actions. As a result, once DeWayne passed away, his children held a vested, possessory interest in half of the farm, and Ohio law granted them the right to partition the property. It is probably safe to assume that Margaret would not have wanted the farm sold while Connie was still alive and lived on the property.
How Better Estate Planning Could Have Helped
This case is a cautionary tale for anyone who wants to keep property—especially family farmland—within the family. Here are a few ways Margaret’s estate plan could have avoided this outcome:
- Survivorship Provisions: Margaret’s will could have created a joint survivorship life estate so that Connie would receive full ownership upon DeWayne’s death. This would have delayed the transfer of DeWayne’s share to his children until after Connie’s passing.
- Use of a Trust: Rather than distributing life estates and remainders through a will, Margaret could have placed the farm into a trust, which would allow for more control over how the property was managed, used, and distributed over multiple generations.
- LLC: Margaret could have placed the farm into an LLC and her heirs could have inherited the LLC. Provisions in the LLC agreement could prevent partition and only allow the farm to be sold if at least a majority of family members consented.
The Takeaway
Estate planning for real estate—especially family farms—requires careful thought and precise legal drafting. Without it, disputes like the one in Stephan v. Wacaster become commonplace. Keeping land in the family for future generations can be accomplished by precise drafting in a will, the use of a trust, or setting up a land LLC.
This case is a reminder that even with the best intentions, a poorly drafted estate plan can drive wedges between family members and lead to the loss of important property. Anyone who wants to preserve their family land should work with an experienced estate planning attorney to create a plan that protects the property.