In discussions about government accountability on these pages, mention of state actors other than the Chinese one is rare, so Wendy Larson’s comment is much welcome, akin to letting much needed air into the room. Her bringing the U.S. into the discussion, while still limited, at least moves us a little closer to an appreciation of our very complex (global) realities.
Given that China — what it is, how it acts, etc. — as a political entity is constantly shaped by its relational interactions with the rest of the world, one wonders how such a neglect of others can have persisted for so long. I realize that this is a China-studies list but, surely, our disciplinary-area specialisms should not define us — or our concerns — so narrowly, lest we become that proverbial frog-in-the-well?
What seems to be sorely needed on these pages are richer, more internationalist, and, hence, more balanced perspectives. Otherwise this blog risks becoming at best a bastion of academic provincialism; at worst, an academic echo-chamber of the China-bashing industry of which the ‘free’ Western corporate media now specialises, and duly profits from. Cultural monotheists may not like it but comparative and contextualised studies are actually needed to make sense of human complexities. Even more so going into the future, I suspect. Continue reading US intelligence concludes China misrepresented coronavirus deaths (3)