Fungicides Use in a Lower Price Environment

by: Carl Zulauf, Ohio State University, Gary Schnitkey and Nick Paulson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Eric Richer, Ohio State University; April 2024

Originally Published at:

Zulauf, C., G. Schnitkey, N. Paulson and E. Richer. “Fungicides Use in a Lower Price Environment.” farmdoc daily (14):83, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, May 1, 2024.  https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2024/05/fungicides-use-in-a-lower-price-environment.html

Click here for PDF of this article

The advisability of applying fungicides may change this year with lower corn and soybean prices and given recent increases in spending on pesticides (farmdoc daily, April 30, 2024).  While the cost of applying fungicides is known, their application introduces two uncertainties:  1) the yield response from using fungicides, and 2) the additional drying cost associated with higher moisture due to fungicide use.  These issues are explored in this paper.  Overall, average yield responses from fungicide yield trials do not suggest that fungicide use is economical at likely commodity price levels for this year.

Yield Response to Cover Application Costs:  Fungicides need to increase yield enough to at least cover material and application costs.  This increase also depends on the price of the crop.  Using a $40/acre material and application cost based on likely 2024 prices, corn yield needs to increase by 5.8 bushels when corn price is $6.95, close to the 2021 harvest price.  At a $4.25 price, near current cash forward bids for 2024 harvest; yield needs to increase 9.4 bushels (see Figure 1).  For soybeans, an increase of 3.6 bushels per acre is needed at today’s cash forward bid of $11.00.  The yield increase needed to cover only the material cost ($25) is also presented in Figure 1.

Uncertain Yield Response:  Studies find a positive but highly variable corn and soybean yield response to the use of fungicides.  Paul, et al. reported an overall average corn yield response of +3.7 to +6.2 bushels per acre that varied across four fungicide products.  Kandel, et al. reported an overall average soybean yield response of +1.6 bushels per acre.  These average yield responses are below break-even yield responses at current crop prices.

Both of these studies are meta (i.e. summary) analyses of a large number of individual studies:  212 corn studies and 240 soybean studies.  Individual studies found yield responses that ranged from negative to large positive.

Other consistent findings from field trials include a higher yield response

  1. the more severe the fungal infection (if infection is low, average response is smaller but still positive),
  2. the less resistant the seed variety, and
  3. the higher is precipitation.

While statistically important, fungal infection, variety resistance, and precipitation explain only a small share of the variation in yield response, implying much more is unknown than known.

Uncertain Cost – Drying:  An unknown cost when applying fungicides is drying cost.  This potential cost arises because fungicides keep the crop greener longer, thus extending its reproductive fill period.  The importance of drying cost is magnified because the entire crop is impacted and because drying costs are not trivial.  Each one percentage point increase in moisture above the no-drying maximum increases corn and soybean drying cost by $20 to $25 per acre (see Figure 2).  Figure 2 is derived using commercial drying charges during the 2023 harvest in North Central, Ohio, but with the percent shrink (i.e. reduction) applied to a crop’s bushels for excess moisture valued at $4.25 for corn and $11.00 for soybeans.  To summarize, the bushels needed to cover the total cost from using fungicides can increase notably if fungicides increase moisture at harvest above the no-drying maximum.

 

Other Costs:  Each added bushel needs to be harvested and transported.  Using the Ohio State University custom rates for 2022 (Ward, Barker, and Richer), harvest cost is $38.60 per acre for corn, or $0.19 per bushel at a 200 bushel yield, and $37.10 per acre for soybeans, or $0.62 per bushel at a 60 bushel yield.  Harvest costs include charges for the combine, grain cart, and on-farm transport.  Transport cost from the farm to market is $0.18 per bushel based on hauling 27 miles one way.  While small, these two costs add up and should not be ignored.  For example, if fungicides increase yield 10 bushels, added corn harvest and transport cost total $3.74 per acre, not far from the value of one bushel at current 2024 cash forward bids.

Discussion

Current cash forward bids of $4.25 for corn and $11.00 for soybeans require yield responses of 9.6 bushels for corn and 3.6 bushels for soybeans to cover a $40 per acre cost of commercial fungicide application plus the cost of harvesting and transporting the increased bushels.

Average yield response from agronomic small plot trials are generally less than these yield increases.

Yield response is generally larger when fungal infection is high and seed is more susceptible.  These findings underpin the common recommendation to practice integrated disease management including crop scouting and cultivar selection.

Yield response to using fungicides is highly variable.  Individual field trials find negative, zero, and very large yield responses.  This variability favors larger farms.  Larger farms have more fields to capture the highly variable but on average positive fungicide yield response.

A major unknown when using fungicides is its impact on moisture at harvest.  Drying costs are expensive.  It takes only a few years of higher moisture due to fungicides to materially raise the bushels needed to cover the total cost incurred by applying fungicides.  On the other hand, Tenuta and Hooker (2009) and Mahoney et al. (2015) found that using fungicides improved corn stalk quality and reduced lodging, which can produce savings by reducing harvest yield loss or allowing later harvest at lower moisture.  The farm management implication is that harvest conditions can materially impact returns to using fungicides.

References

Kandel, Y.R., C. Hunt, K. Ames, N. Arneson, C.A. Bradley, E. Byamukama, A. Byrne, M.I. Chilvers, L.J. Giesler, J. Halvorson, ,D. C. Hooker, N.M. Kleczewski, D.K. Malvick, S. Markell, B. Potter, W. Pedersen, D.L. Smith, A.U. Tenuta, D.E.P. Telenko, K.A. Wise, and D.S. Mueller.  2021.  Meta-Analysis of Soybean Yield Response to Foliar Fungicides Evaluated from 2005 to 2018 in the United States and Canada.  Plant Disease. Volume 105, pages 1382-1389.

Mahoney, K.J., Klapwyk, J.H., Stewart, G.A., Jay, W.S., Hooker, D.C., 2015. Agronomic management strategies to reduce the yield loss associated with spring harvested corn in Ontario. Am. J. Plant Sci. 6(02) (372). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ ajps.2015.62043.

Paul, P.A., L.V. Madden, C.A. Bradley, A.E. Robertson, G.P. Munkvold, G. Shaner, K.A. Wise, D.K. Malvick, T.W.Allen , A. Grybauskas, P. Vincelli, and P. Esker.  2011.  Meta-analysis of yield response of hybrid field corn to foliar fungicides in the U.S. Corn Belt.  Phytopathology.  Volume 101 (Issue 9), pages 1122-1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/ PHYTO-03-11-0091.

Paulson, N., C. Zulauf, and G. Schnitkey.  April 30, 2024.  Trends in Input Costs for Corn and Soybean Production in Illinois.  farmdoc daily (14):82.  Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.  http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/

Tenuta, A., Hooker, D., 2009. Lodging (stalk rot) and corn fungicides. Crop Pest Ont. 14 (11), 1e5. Online publication. http://journals1.scholarsportal.info/pdf/ 12032204/v14i0011/1_lracf.xml

Ward, B., F. J. Barker, and E. Richer.  2022.  Ohio Farm Custom Rates 2022. Ohio State University Extension.   https://farmoffice.osu.edu/farm-management/custom-rates-and-machinery-costs

 

OSU Extension Awarded 2024 Extension Risk Management Grant

The North Central Extension Risk Management Education Center recently announced that OSU Extension was selected as a grant recipients for the 2024 NCERME Competitive Grants Program for a project titled “Reducing Farm Transition Risk Through the Use of The Farm and Resource Management Spreadsheet (FARMS)”

The goal of this $75,058 project is to help Ohio farmer to better manage risk through the use of the newly develop farm transition and estate planning spreadsheet. The FARMS project is being led by David Marrison, Interim Director for the Farm Financial Management and Policy Institute and Robert Moore, Director of the Ohio Farm Resolution Services.

This grant is supported by USDA/NIFA under Award Number 2023-70027-40444.

 

 

Farm Credit Mid-America Condition and Performance

By:  Rae Ju, a Ph.D. student, Charles Smith, an undergraduate student, and Ani L. Katchova, Professor and Farm Income Enhancement Chair in the Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics at The Ohio State University.

Click here to access the pdf version of the report.

  • Farm Credit Mid-America (FCMA) is an important agricultural credit institution in the Farm Credit System, providing agricultural loans, insurance, and leasing to the agricultural sector.
  • FCMA’s total loan portfolio consisted of several types of loans: 62.9% of real estate mortgage loans, followed by 17.4% of production and intermediate loans and 12.2% of agribusiness loans in 2022.
  • FCMA’s total percentage of risk loans fell from 1.66% in 2017 to 0.81% in 2022.
  • FCMA’s net interest income continuously increased, reaching $615 million in 2022, aligning with an upward trend in net income that reached $457 million in 2022.
  • FCMA’s net interest margin remained relatively stable, remaining at 2.2% from 2018 to 2020, with a slight decline to 2.1% in 2021 and remained the same in 2022.

Ohio Farmland Trends and Preservation

By:  Xiaoyi Fang and Zhining Sun, Ph.D. students and Ani L. Katchova, Professor and Farm Income Enhancement Chair in the Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics at The Ohio State University and Rabail Chandio, an Assistant Professor and Extension Economist in the Department of Economics at Iowa State University.

Click here to access the pdf version of the report.

  • 95% of farmland is dedicated to cropland in Ohio.
  • Cropland values in Ohio have had an upward trend, and increased by 9% in 2023, while the number of acres operated has declined over the years.
  • 85% of the total rented farmland in Ohio was owned by non-operator landlords in 2014.
  • Ohio’s operator landlords received $174.39 million in rent in 2014. Non-operator landlords received $844.62 million in rent, or 82.9% of the total rent paid in 2014.
  • 9% of Ohio’s farmland is held by individuals aged 55 and over, suggesting a significant transfer of land to the next generation is expected in the future.
  • Ohio Department of Agriculture’s Farmland Preservation Office has offered several programs to help preserve Ohio farmland.

 

Foreign Investments in Ohio Farmland

By:  Vishavdeep Sharma, a Ph.D. student in the Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics at The Ohio State University, Rabail Chandio, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics at Iowa State University, and Ani L. Katchova, a Professor and Farm Income Enhancement Chair in the Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics at The Ohio State University.

Click here to access the pdf version of the report.

In recent years, Ohio has experienced a significant increase in foreign investments in farmland resulting in 529,269 acres being held by foreign investors in 2022, contributing to the national trend of increasing foreign ownership of US farmland with 43,418,141 acres held by foreign investors in 2022.

The proportion of foreign held to privately held farmland was 2.7% in Ohio, 2.2% in the Midwest, and 3.4% in the US in 2022.

The Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act (AFIDA) is a federal law that requires foreign investors to disclose transactions of US farmland. Ohio’s legislation, named “Save our Farmland and Protect our National Security Act,” additionally maintains a registry of individuals and organizations prohibited from acquiring farmland in the state of Ohio.

In Ohio, Canada (14.9%) and Germany (14.6%) lead foreign investments in farmland. The largest proportion of foreign held farmland is by Canadian investors at 32.1% of the total foreign held farmland in the US, and at 26.5% of the total foreign held farmland in the Midwest.

 

2024 Second Quarter Fertilizer Prices Across Ohio

Authors: Amanda Bennett, Eric Richer, Clint Schroeder, OSU Extension

Click here to access a PDF version of this article

Results from a quarterly survey of retail fertilizer prices in the state of Ohio revealed fertilizer prices were slightly lower than national averages reported by Progressive Farmer – DTN (Quinn, 2024). The survey was completed by 32 retailers, representing 19 counties, who do business in the state of Ohio. Respondents were asked to quote spot prices as of the first day of the quarter (April 1st) based on sale type indicated. This is part of a larger study conducted by OSU Extension to better understand local fertilizer prices, which began in December 2023.

In summary, survey participants reported the average price of all fertilizers was lower in Ohio compared to the national prices, except for DAP (18-46-0) at $785/ton in Ohio versus $780/ton nationally, (Quinn, 2024).

The chart below (Table 1.) is the summary of the survey responses. The responses (n) are the number of survey responses for each product. The minimum and maximum values reflect the minimum and maximum values reported in the survey. The average is the simple average of all survey responses for each product rounded to the nearest dollar. We recognize that many factors influence a company’s spot price for fertilizer including but not limited to availability, geography, volume, cost of freight, competition, regulation, etc.

Table 1. Second Quarter 2024 Ohio Fertilizer Prices

 

 

Product Responses (n) Sale Type Min

$/ton

Max

$/ton

Avg

$/ton

Anhydrous ammonia 82-0-0 15 FOB Plant $707 $870 $785
UAN 28-0-0 19 Direct to Farm $309 $600 $348
Urea 46-0-0 17 FOB Plant $522 $680 $561
MAP 11-52-0 19 FOB Plant $745 $1079 $795
DAP18-46-0 9 FOB Plant $760 $830 $785
APP 10-34-0 20 Direct to Farm $553 $680 $602
Potash 0-0-60 20 FOB Plant $432 $512 $472
Ammonium Sulfate 21-0-0-24 18 FOB Plant $430 $585 $479
Ammonium Thio-Sulfate 12-0-0-26 13 FOB Plant $325 $448 $385
Poultry Litter 9 Delivered & applied, <25 miles $45 $72 $55

When compared to results from the previous quarter’s survey, prices for fertilizers saw a modest increase, with only anhydrous ammonia, MAP and potash showing a slight decrease. DAP and urea saw the most increase in price from the previous quarter with DAP up $50/ton and urea up $59/ton. This increase equates to an increase in price of 9% for both DAP and urea. Only ammonium thio-sulfate remained unchanged.

Quarter 2 survey data included nine responses to questions about poultry litter, delivered and applied within a 25-mile radius of the facility. Prices ranged from $45-72/ton with an average of $55/ton reported. If you are a retailer interested in participating in this study, please contact Amanda Bennett at bennett.709@osu.edu.

Resources

Bennett, A., Richer, E., & Schroeder, C. (2024). 2024 First Quarter Fertilizer Prices Across Ohio. Ohio Ag Manager Blog.

https://u.osu.edu/ohioagmanager/2024/01/17/first-quarter-2024-fertilizer-prices-across-ohio/

Quinn, R. 2024. DTN Retail Fertilizer Trends. DTN Progressive Farmer. Accessed online April 11, 2024 at https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/crops/article/2024/04/10/uan28-leads-fertilizer-prices-higher

Farm Office Live to be held on April 19 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon

This month’s webinar will feature the following topics:

  • CAT Tax – Closing Accounts
  • Taxation of Equipment Trade-ins
  • 2024 Crop Input Outlook
  • OSU Fertilizer Survey Q2 Release
  • Dairy Margin Coverage Program
  • Beginning Farmer Tax Credit Update
  • Transferring Operating Assets
  • Beneficial Ownership Reporting Update
  • Trends in Farm Appraisals

Featured presenters will include: Jason Hartschuh (OSU Field Specialist- Dairy Management and Precision Livestock), Clint Schroeder (Program Manager – Farm Business Analysis), Robert Moore (OSU Ag and Resource Law Program), Amanda Bennett (OSU Extension Educator), Barry Ward and Jeff Lewis (OSU Income Tax School Program), and David Marrison and Eric Richer  (OSU Field Specialists -Farm Management) and special guest Tim Harpster.

To register for this program (or to access replays of previous programs):

go.osu.edu/farmofficelive

Ohio Farm Numbers, Land in Farms, and Agricultural Land Lost to Development

By: Professor Ani Katchova, Farm Income Enhancement Chair and PhD students Xiaoyi Fang and Rae Ju in the Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics (AEDE) at the Ohio State University.

Click here to access the pdf version of the report.

According to the Census of Agriculture, the number of farms in Ohio decreased from 77,797 farms in 2002 to 76,009 farms in 2022, a decrease of 2.3% over the 20-year period.  Land in farms in Ohio decreased from 14,583,435 acres in 2002 to 13,652,346 acres in 2022, leading to a loss of 931,089 acres between 2002 and 2022, representing a 6.4% decrease.

According to the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) of the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium using satellite imagery data (https://www.mrlc.gov/eva/), 355,085 acres in agricultural land (cultivated crops and pasture/hay) were lost in Ohio from 2001 to 2021. Specifically, 180,691 acres of agricultural land in Ohio was lost to development, which represents 51% of the agricultural land loss being attributed to development from 2001 to 2021.

Counties located in Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) had among the largest percentage declines in farm numbers (by about 35%) and land in farms (by about 35% to 65%) and among the highest percentages of agricultural land lost to development (above 65%) across the state of Ohio.

 

OSU Extension Farm Office Live to be held on Friday, March 15 from 10:00 to 12:00 noon

This month’s webinar will feature the following topics:

  • 2nd Marriages and Transition Planning
  • Legislative Update
  • New Rule for Independent Contractors
  • 2024 Crop Input Outlook
  • Industry Panel on WASDE and Strategies for the 2024 Grain Marketing Plan
  • Hot Topics
  • Upcoming Programs

Featured presenters will include: Robert Moore and Peggy Hall (OSU Ag and Resource Law Program), Barry Ward and Jeff Lewis (OSU Income Tax School Program), and Bruce Clevenger  (OSU Field Specialist -Farm Management).

To register for this program (or to access replays of previous programs):

go.osu.edu/farmofficelive

Characteristics of Ohio Women in Agriculture

By: PhD student Rae Ju and Professor Ani Katchova, Farm Income Enhancement Chair, in the Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics (AEDE), and Nanette L. Neal and Sarah Noggle, Extension Educators in Agriculture and Natural Resources in the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences Department of Extension at the Ohio State University.

Click here to access the pdf version of the report.

Using data from the 2022 Census of Agriculture, the characteristics of female farmers in Ohio are examined and compared to the overall farming population. Continue reading