By: Barry Ward (Leader, Production Business Management, Ohio State University Extension, Agriculture and Natural Resources), Eric Richer (Field Specialist, Farm Management, Ohio State University Extension, Agriculture and Natural Resources), John Barker (Extension Educator, Agriculture/Amos Program, Ohio State University Extension Knox County) and Amanda Bennett (Extension Educator, Agriculture & Natural Resources, Ohio State University Extension Miami County)

Farming is a complex business and many Ohio farmers utilize outside assistance for specific farm-related work. This option is appealing for tasks requiring specialized equipment or technical expertise. Often, having someone else with specialized tools perform tasks is more cost effective and saves time. Farm work completed by others is often referred to as “custom farm work” or more simply, “custom work”. A “custom rate” is the amount agreed upon by both parties to be paid by the custom work customer to the custom work provider.

Custom rates increased for the majority of field operations in 2024 as compared to surveyed rates in 2022 but the increases did vary by operation. Examples include an increase of 6% for Planting Corn (30 Inch Rows with Fertilizer Application), 5.6% for Harvesting Corn (Combine, Grain Cart, Haul Local to Farm), 21% for Spraying (Self-Propelled Sprayer, Crop Protection Chemicals) and 24% for Field Cultivator.

New field operations in this year’s survey and summary include drone/UAV application and cover crop seeding.

Ohio Farm Custom Rates

Click here for PDF of the 2024 Ohio Farm Custom Rates

The “Ohio Farm Custom Rates 2024” publication reports custom rates based on a statewide survey of 333 farmers, custom operators, farm managers, and landowners conducted in 2024. These rates, except where noted, include the implement and tractor if required, all variable machinery costs such as fuel, oil, lube, twine, etc., and labor for the operation.

Some custom rates published in this study vary widely, possibly influenced by:

• Type or size of equipment used (e.g. 20-shank chisel plow versus a 9-shank)
• Size and shape of fields
• Condition of the crop (for harvesting operations)
• Skill level of labor
• Amount of labor needed in relation to the equipment capabilities
• Cost margin differences for full-time custom operators compared to farmers supplementing current income

Some custom rates reflect discounted rates as the parties involved have family or community relationships. Discounted rates may also occur when the custom work provider is attempting to strengthen a relationship to help secure the custom farmed land in a future purchase, cash rental or other rental agreement. Some providers charge differently because they are simply attempting to spread their fixed costs over more acreage to decrease fixed costs per acre and are willing to forgo complete cost recovery.

Charges may be added if the custom provider considers a job abnormal such as distance from the operator’s base location, difficulty of terrain, amount of product or labor involved with the operation, or other special requirements of the custom work customer.

The data from this survey are intended to show a representative farming industry cost for specified machines and operations in Ohio. As a custom farm work provider, the average rates reported in this publication may not cover your total costs for performing the custom service. As a customer, you may not be able to hire a custom service for the average rate published in this factsheet.

It is recommended that you calculate your own costs carefully before determining the custom rate to charge or pay. It may be helpful to compare the custom rates reported in this fact sheet with machinery costs calculated by economic engineering models available online. The following resources are available to help you calculate and consider the total costs of performing a given machinery operation.

• Farm Machinery Cost Estimates, available by searching University of Minnesota.
• Illinois Farm Management Handbook, available by searching University of Illinois farmdoc.
• Estimating Farm Machinery Costs, available by searching Iowa State University agriculture decision maker and machinery management.

Volatility in diesel price may sometimes cause concern for custom rate providers that seek to cover all or most of the costs associated with custom farm operations. The approximate price of diesel fuel during the survey period (January – April 2024) ranged from $3.20 – $3.50 per gallon for off-road (farm) usage. As a custom farm work provider, if you feel that your rate doesn’t capture your full costs due to fuel price increases you might consider a custom rate increase or fuel surcharge based on the increase in fuel costs.

The complete “Ohio Farm Custom Rates 2024” publication is available online at the Farm Office website: https://farmoffice.osu.edu/farm-management/custom-rates-and-machinery-cost

by: Carl Zulauf, Ohio State University, Gary Schnitkey and Nick Paulson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Eric Richer, Ohio State University; April 2024

Originally Published at:

Zulauf, C., G. Schnitkey, N. Paulson and E. Richer. “Fungicides Use in a Lower Price Environment.” farmdoc daily (14):83, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, May 1, 2024.  https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2024/05/fungicides-use-in-a-lower-price-environment.html

Click here for PDF of this article

The advisability of applying fungicides may change this year with lower corn and soybean prices and given recent increases in spending on pesticides (farmdoc daily, April 30, 2024).  While the cost of applying fungicides is known, their application introduces two uncertainties:  1) the yield response from using fungicides, and 2) the additional drying cost associated with higher moisture due to fungicide use.  These issues are explored in this paper.  Overall, average yield responses from fungicide yield trials do not suggest that fungicide use is economical at likely commodity price levels for this year.

Yield Response to Cover Application Costs:  Fungicides need to increase yield enough to at least cover material and application costs.  This increase also depends on the price of the crop.  Using a $40/acre material and application cost based on likely 2024 prices, corn yield needs to increase by 5.8 bushels when corn price is $6.95, close to the 2021 harvest price.  At a $4.25 price, near current cash forward bids for 2024 harvest; yield needs to increase 9.4 bushels (see Figure 1).  For soybeans, an increase of 3.6 bushels per acre is needed at today’s cash forward bid of $11.00.  The yield increase needed to cover only the material cost ($25) is also presented in Figure 1.

Uncertain Yield Response:  Studies find a positive but highly variable corn and soybean yield response to the use of fungicides.  Paul, et al. reported an overall average corn yield response of +3.7 to +6.2 bushels per acre that varied across four fungicide products.  Kandel, et al. reported an overall average soybean yield response of +1.6 bushels per acre.  These average yield responses are below break-even yield responses at current crop prices.

Both of these studies are meta (i.e. summary) analyses of a large number of individual studies:  212 corn studies and 240 soybean studies.  Individual studies found yield responses that ranged from negative to large positive.

Other consistent findings from field trials include a higher yield response

1. the more severe the fungal infection (if infection is low, average response is smaller but still positive),
2. the less resistant the seed variety, and
3. the higher is precipitation.

While statistically important, fungal infection, variety resistance, and precipitation explain only a small share of the variation in yield response, implying much more is unknown than known.

Uncertain Cost – Drying:  An unknown cost when applying fungicides is drying cost.  This potential cost arises because fungicides keep the crop greener longer, thus extending its reproductive fill period.  The importance of drying cost is magnified because the entire crop is impacted and because drying costs are not trivial.  Each one percentage point increase in moisture above the no-drying maximum increases corn and soybean drying cost by $20 to $25 per acre (see Figure 2).  Figure 2 is derived using commercial drying charges during the 2023 harvest in North Central, Ohio, but with the percent shrink (i.e. reduction) applied to a crop’s bushels for excess moisture valued at $4.25 for corn and $11.00 for soybeans.  To summarize, the bushels needed to cover the total cost from using fungicides can increase notably if fungicides increase moisture at harvest above the no-drying maximum.

Other Costs:  Each added bushel needs to be harvested and transported.  Using the Ohio State University custom rates for 2022 (Ward, Barker, and Richer), harvest cost is $38.60 per acre for corn, or $0.19 per bushel at a 200 bushel yield, and $37.10 per acre for soybeans, or $0.62 per bushel at a 60 bushel yield.  Harvest costs include charges for the combine, grain cart, and on-farm transport.  Transport cost from the farm to market is $0.18 per bushel based on hauling 27 miles one way.  While small, these two costs add up and should not be ignored.  For example, if fungicides increase yield 10 bushels, added corn harvest and transport cost total $3.74 per acre, not far from the value of one bushel at current 2024 cash forward bids.

Discussion

Current cash forward bids of $4.25 for corn and $11.00 for soybeans require yield responses of 9.6 bushels for corn and 3.6 bushels for soybeans to cover a $40 per acre cost of commercial fungicide application plus the cost of harvesting and transporting the increased bushels.

Average yield response from agronomic small plot trials are generally less than these yield increases.

Yield response is generally larger when fungal infection is high and seed is more susceptible.  These findings underpin the common recommendation to practice integrated disease management including crop scouting and cultivar selection.

Yield response to using fungicides is highly variable.  Individual field trials find negative, zero, and very large yield responses.  This variability favors larger farms.  Larger farms have more fields to capture the highly variable but on average positive fungicide yield response.

A major unknown when using fungicides is its impact on moisture at harvest.  Drying costs are expensive.  It takes only a few years of higher moisture due to fungicides to materially raise the bushels needed to cover the total cost incurred by applying fungicides.  On the other hand, Tenuta and Hooker (2009) and Mahoney et al. (2015) found that using fungicides improved corn stalk quality and reduced lodging, which can produce savings by reducing harvest yield loss or allowing later harvest at lower moisture.  The farm management implication is that harvest conditions can materially impact returns to using fungicides.

References

Kandel, Y.R., C. Hunt, K. Ames, N. Arneson, C.A. Bradley, E. Byamukama, A. Byrne, M.I. Chilvers, L.J. Giesler, J. Halvorson, ,D. C. Hooker, N.M. Kleczewski, D.K. Malvick, S. Markell, B. Potter, W. Pedersen, D.L. Smith, A.U. Tenuta, D.E.P. Telenko, K.A. Wise, and D.S. Mueller.  2021.  Meta-Analysis of Soybean Yield Response to Foliar Fungicides Evaluated from 2005 to 2018 in the United States and Canada.  Plant Disease. Volume 105, pages 1382-1389.

Mahoney, K.J., Klapwyk, J.H., Stewart, G.A., Jay, W.S., Hooker, D.C., 2015. Agronomic management strategies to reduce the yield loss associated with spring harvested corn in Ontario. Am. J. Plant Sci. 6(02) (372). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ ajps.2015.62043.

Paul, P.A., L.V. Madden, C.A. Bradley, A.E. Robertson, G.P. Munkvold, G. Shaner, K.A. Wise, D.K. Malvick, T.W.Allen , A. Grybauskas, P. Vincelli, and P. Esker.  2011.  Meta-analysis of yield response of hybrid field corn to foliar fungicides in the U.S. Corn Belt.  Phytopathology.  Volume 101 (Issue 9), pages 1122-1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/ PHYTO-03-11-0091.

Paulson, N., C. Zulauf, and G. Schnitkey.  April 30, 2024.  Trends in Input Costs for Corn and Soybean Production in Illinois.  farmdoc daily (14):82.  Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.  http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/

Tenuta, A., Hooker, D., 2009. Lodging (stalk rot) and corn fungicides. Crop Pest Ont. 14 (11), 1e5. Online publication. http://journals1.scholarsportal.info/pdf/ 12032204/v14i0011/1_lracf.xml

Ward, B., F. J. Barker, and E. Richer.  2022.  Ohio Farm Custom Rates 2022. Ohio State University Extension.   https://farmoffice.osu.edu/farm-management/custom-rates-and-machinery-costs

By:  Rae Ju, a Ph.D. student, Charles Smith, an undergraduate student, and Ani L. Katchova, Professor and Farm Income Enhancement Chair in the Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics at The Ohio State University.

Click here to access the pdf version of the report.

• Farm Credit Mid-America (FCMA) is an important agricultural credit institution in the Farm Credit System, providing agricultural loans, insurance, and leasing to the agricultural sector.
• FCMA’s total loan portfolio consisted of several types of loans: 62.9% of real estate mortgage loans, followed by 17.4% of production and intermediate loans and 12.2% of agribusiness loans in 2022.
• FCMA’s total percentage of risk loans fell from 1.66% in 2017 to 0.81% in 2022.
• FCMA’s net interest income continuously increased, reaching $615 million in 2022, aligning with an upward trend in net income that reached $457 million in 2022.
• FCMA’s net interest margin remained relatively stable, remaining at 2.2% from 2018 to 2020, with a slight decline to 2.1% in 2021 and remained the same in 2022.

Authors: Amanda Bennett, Eric Richer, Clint Schroeder, OSU Extension

Click here to access a PDF version of this article

Results from a quarterly survey of retail fertilizer prices in the state of Ohio revealed fertilizer prices were slightly lower than national averages reported by Progressive Farmer – DTN (Quinn, 2024). The survey was completed by 32 retailers, representing 19 counties, who do business in the state of Ohio. Respondents were asked to quote spot prices as of the first day of the quarter (April 1st) based on sale type indicated. This is part of a larger study conducted by OSU Extension to better understand local fertilizer prices, which began in December 2023.

In summary, survey participants reported the average price of all fertilizers was lower in Ohio compared to the national prices, except for DAP (18-46-0) at $785/ton in Ohio versus $780/ton nationally, (Quinn, 2024).

The chart below (Table 1.) is the summary of the survey responses. The responses (n) are the number of survey responses for each product. The minimum and maximum values reflect the minimum and maximum values reported in the survey. The average is the simple average of all survey responses for each product rounded to the nearest dollar. We recognize that many factors influence a company’s spot price for fertilizer including but not limited to availability, geography, volume, cost of freight, competition, regulation, etc.

Table 1. Second Quarter 2024 Ohio Fertilizer Prices

When compared to results from the previous quarter’s survey, prices for fertilizers saw a modest increase, with only anhydrous ammonia, MAP and potash showing a slight decrease. DAP and urea saw the most increase in price from the previous quarter with DAP up $50/ton and urea up $59/ton. This increase equates to an increase in price of 9% for both DAP and urea. Only ammonium thio-sulfate remained unchanged.

Quarter 2 survey data included nine responses to questions about poultry litter, delivered and applied within a 25-mile radius of the facility. Prices ranged from $45-72/ton with an average of $55/ton reported. If you are a retailer interested in participating in this study, please contact Amanda Bennett at bennett.709@osu.edu.

Resources

Bennett, A., Richer, E., & Schroeder, C. (2024). 2024 First Quarter Fertilizer Prices Across Ohio. Ohio Ag Manager Blog.

https://u.osu.edu/ohioagmanager/2024/01/17/first-quarter-2024-fertilizer-prices-across-ohio/

Quinn, R. 2024. DTN Retail Fertilizer Trends. DTN Progressive Farmer. Accessed online April 11, 2024 at https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/crops/article/2024/04/10/uan28-leads-fertilizer-prices-higher