ADVANCED R&D

*Work in progress

Battery Voltage Research

Objective

To normalize the time it takes to travel a fixed distance that the AEV travels when using batteries of different charge.

Equipment

  1. Batteries
  2. AEV
  3. USB Micro USB Cable
  4. Arduino Software
  5. MATLAB Software

Procedure

Using a fully charged battery, run the AEV for 3 feet and determine how long that takes. Repeat this multiple times using varying power. Continue to run the AEV as the voltage in the battery begins to drop from testing. If the speed and performance of the motors and in turn the AEV is constant, there should be no time loss between trials, despite the voltage of the battery decreasing.

This table shows the amount of power needed to run the AEV for 3ft at various battery Voltages.

Trial* Time (s) Voltage (V)** Power to Motors
1 3.78 9.748 40
2 3.871 9.741 40
3 3.84 9.727 40
10 3.782 9.683 40
11 3.6 9.521 40
4 2.521 9.727 50
5 2.522 9.712 50
6 2.46 9.712 50
12 2.52 9.668 50
13 2.521 9.521 50
7 1.981 9.697 60
8 1.98 9.697 60
9 1.982 9.683 60
14 1.981 9.668 60
15 1.98 9.507 60

*Trials are disordered to organize voltages in descending order for each motor speed group

**voltage is averaged from the first 2 seconds of the Arduino run (AEV unmoving).

Based on the data collected, minor changes in voltage do not affect how effective the motors are at moving the AEV.  As voltage decreased, time increased 5/12 times. This is not a very strong correlation of decreasing voltage to decreasing motor efficiency. Though during some trials decreases in voltage corresponded with increases in time, most of the trials showed inconclusive or contradictory results to the predicted outcome. This research suggests that the batteries we use are reliable and supply consistent power to the AEV despite small voltage drops.

 

Propeller Configuration Research

Objective

To determine which orientation of propellers will be the most effective at moving the AEV vehicle

Equipment

  1. Batteries
  2. AEV
  3. USB Micro USB Cable
  4. Arduino Software
  5. MATLAB Software
  6. Tape

Procedure

5 different kinds of propeller orientations will be compared on distance traveled with time and power to the motors being held constant. Motors will be run at a speed of 50 for 1 second. After 3 seconds, the AEV will coast a certain extra distance depending on how effective each configuration is. The base of the AEV will be the same for each trial to ensure that the weight is the same for each trial. Configurations are described below:

  • (1) Contra-rotating propellers 1
    • Motors facing inwards from AEV and are close together
  • (2) Contra-rotating propellers 2
    • Motors facing inwards from AEV and are far apart from each other
  • (3) Contra-rotating propellers 3
    • Motors facing outwards from AEV and are far apart from each other
  • (4) Side-by-side propellers
    • Motors side by side and facing the same direction
  • (5) Facing the same direction
    • Motors on Standoff in a line facing the same direction
  • (6) Contra-rotating propellers 2
    • Motors facing inwards from AEV and are close together, propeller facing proper direction
  • (7) Contra-rotating propellers 3
    • Motors facing inwards from AEV and are close together, propeller facing proper direction, reverse
Propeller Configuration Total Distance Traveled (sensor ticks)
1 39
2 43
3 48
4 109
5 26
6 70
7 78

Conclusion:

Although the Side-by-Side propellers traveled the most distance, it would be more efficient to use the contra-rotating propellers so the AEV will have the same efficiency and distance traveled while approaching and proceeding from the gate.

 

Reflective Wheel

Objective

To determine how the starting position of the wheel affects the AEV’s travel distance.

Equipment

  1. AEV
  2. USB Micro USB Cable
  3. Arduino Software
  4. MATLAB Software
  5. Ruler

Procedure

The wheel with reflective tape will be started at various positions and the AEV will use a position function to attempt to reach a certain distance. The true distance traveled by the AEV will be measured with a ruler. The next trials will be conducted in the same way and compared to the original trial. This will be repeated for multiple wheel starting positions.

 

Trial Wheel Starting Position Distance
1 Right 157.0625
2 Right 145.375
3 Right 149.4375
4 Right 149.875
5 Right 113.375
6 Left 119.125
7 Left 123.0625
8 Left 141.875
9 Left 156.75
10 Left 155.9375
11 Top 163
12 Top 163.875
13 Top 162.5
14 Top 161.5
15 Top 168.75
16 Right 167.0625
17 Left 164.3125
18 Bottom 166.875
19 Bottom 165.3125
20 Bottom 130.75
21 Bottom 134.625
22 Bottom 150.25

 

Conclusion: