| Design 1 | Design 2 | |||
| Trial | Time (s) | Engery (J) | Time (s) | Energy (J) |
| 1 | 39.543 | 137.639 | 42.840 | 175.511 |
| 2 | 43.983 | 184.389 | ||
| 3 | 40.260 | 157.313 | ||
During the second phase of performance testing the team came to the conclusion that Design 1 is in fact more efficient than Design 2. Due to time constraints Design 2 was only tested once. However, since Design 2’s trial yielded similar results to that of Design 1’s second trial the team came to the conclusion that Design 2 would have similar trials.