Previous Designs
Design D
Pros: When we tested Design D for our concept screening and scoring tests, this design performed average and above in stability, minimal blockage, maintenance and durability.
Cons: The only problem with Design D had to deal with its safety. There is a concern that the vehicle itself isn’t going to be able to maintain itself for the entirety of the tests.
Design B
Pros: When we tested Design B for our concept and screening tests, this design performed average and above in minimal blockage, maintenance and durability.
Cons: The only problem with Design D had to deal with its safety and stability. There were concerns with how stable the design would be during tests along with the overall safety of the design as well.
Design A
Pros: When we tested Design A for our concept and screening tests, this design performed average and above in stability, minimal blockage, and safety.
Cons: The problems involved with Design A dealt with the maintenance and durability of the design. It was determined that the design itself had issues with its durability that negatively affected the maintenance of the design overall.
Design C
Pros: When we tested Design C for our concept and screening tests, this design performed average and above in minimal blockage, maintenance, and durability.
Cons: The various problems with Design C include stability and durability. Upon further research, design C showed flaws in the overall stability and durability of the design within its structure.
Designs Moving Forward:
The two designs our group decided to go forward with are design A and design D, shown below.
Design A Design D