A Buddhist Approach to the Mind-Body Problem/Consciousness

Over the course of the past week in class, we have been discussing the very interesting topic of the Mind-Body problem as it relates to philosophy. We have discussed many theories regarding this topic, and I offer an additional one in this post: the Buddhist approach to the Mind-Body problem. According to Buddhism, the mind and the body are unified, with consciousness (inner subjective awareness) being primary. As per Mahayana Buddhism, the body is viewed “as the densest layer of a spectrum of being that ranges in quality from the dense (body) to the subtle (mind) to the very subtle (pure awareness without thought).” According to a different offset of Buddhism, Zen Buddhism, this very subtle quality of consciousness is believed to be the essential quality of all things, including the body, and is therefore termed “Big Mind.” Interestingly, this view claims that because “Big Mind permeates virtually all things, there can be no actual duality between mind and body.” That is, the mind and body differ only superficially in quality. Additionally, an important point to mention is that though consciousness is seen as primary as per Buddhism, it is not the “first cause.” In other words, consciousness does not cause anything, because such a view would imply that there exists a duality between consciousness and that which is caused by consciousness, a violation of the core ideal of Buddhist philosophy that in the reality of things, there is no fundamental duality between a subject and an object.

Overall, I believe that the Buddhist view of the Mind-Body problem is interesting and certainly plausible. It seems to suggest that consciousness is a phenomenon that just exists within us and permeates throughout our mind and our bodies. Could it then be said that it is fundamental, like David Chalmers postulates? I think it can be, provided that “fundamental” does not imply causation.

Source: http://www.examiner.com/article/buddhism-brain-science-and-the-mind-body-connection

11 thoughts on “A Buddhist Approach to the Mind-Body Problem/Consciousness

  1. Be careful philosophizing about the mind body connection. The relationship of the mind body and spirit is directly observable to all who sincerely wish to know and are willing to allow their lives to be teachers. There is a truth which is beyond guessing.
    As a doctor, I too was taught the problem solving approach of intellectualizing. I can now see how it is wrong. There is a way to recieve answers to complex life problems, through a process of letting go and opening up.

  2. Presumably the invisible guide manifests in the form of serendipity to receive the right answers to seemingly complex issues by letting go the conditioned thoughts and prepared to receive the “light”.

  3. Once you have controlled the mind, you have controlled the body I understood to be a fundamental tenet of buddhism, as in the demonstation of the mind, as decision-maker, to have the body raise its own temperature, to maintain good health, or overcome ill-health. Your body is controlled by your mind, if you train the mind to do so. Are these not tenets of Buddhism?

  4. They instead focus on achieving enlightenment—a state of inner peace and wisdom. When followers reach this spiritual echelon, they’re said to have experienced nirvana. The religion’s founder, Buddha, is considered an extraordinary being, but not a god. Cinema HD V2 tq.

  5. In contrast with many Indian religious traditions, Buddhism does not regard the body and the mind or spirit as being two entirely separate entities – there is no sense in Buddhism that the body is a “vessel” that is guided or inhabited by the mind or spirit. by Upflix Apk

  6. According to the 14th Dalai Lama the mind can be defined “as an entity that has the nature of mere experience, that is, ‘clarity and knowing’. It is the knowing nature, or agency, that is called mind, and this is non-material.” The simultaneously dual nature of mind is as follows: 1 by Apollo tv

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.