| Part | Price ($) |
| Arduino | 100000.00 |
| Electric Motors (2) | 19800.00 |
| Count Sensor (2) | 4000.00 |
| Count Sensor Connector (2) | 4000.00 |
| Propellers (2) | 900.00 |
| T-Shape | 2000.00 |
| T-Shape Arm | 3000.00 |
| Wheels (2) | 15000.00 |
| Battery Supports | 2000.00 |
| Angle Brackets (3) | 2520.00 |
| Screw Driver | 2000.00 |
| ¼” Wrench | 2000.00 |
| Motor Clamps (2) | 1180.00 |
| Bulk Screws and Nuts | 2.88 |
| TOTAL COST: | $158,402.88 |
| TOTAL WEIGHT: | 241 grams |
Speed
Team Q’s AEV was able to complete the Final Performance Test in around 46 seconds, which was under the class average, as shown in Figure 1 above. This not only proves that this AEV can complete its task quickly but safely as well, which was one of the main goals listed in Team Q’s Mission Concept Review.
Weight
Also shown in Figure 1, this AEV’s cost of materials is also under the class average. Table 1 above provides a more in-depth analysis of each piece and shows that the AEV weighs 141 grams. Since the amount of material used to construct this AEV is relative low, the time used for assembly and construction is kept to a minimum. The AEV’s low weight allows the AEV to use less energy to move and stop, lowering costs.
Balance
Safety is of the utmost importance when providing transportation. Team Q’s AEV did not get deducted any safety points during its second attempt at the Final Performance Test. One of the major attributes, that contributed to the safeness of the AEV is its design. Namely, the T-shaped arm allowed the AEV to maintain its balance on the tracks and keep a constant center of gravity.
Connection with Caboose
Connecting the caboose to the AEV with a magnetic hitch was a crucial part of testing. The AEV was also able to proceed to the loading zone at a reasonable speed to connect to the caboose without excessive recoil. It was then able to transport the caboose back to the starting dock. The AEV did not disconnect from the caboose during the elevation changes and when stopping at the gate and starting dock.