Tyranny of Personhood
The above link is to my latest article. This is the abstract
This Article applies a disability justice framework to consider the issue of affirmative action under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The central argument is that originalists have misinterpreted the term “person” to avoid a group-based understanding of racial equality. Further, siloed understandings of equality—which treat race and disability as distinct—fail to recognize the interconnected web of racial and disability subordination. For example, constitutional claims for equal educational access in the 1970s arose from an understanding that government entities excluded many Black youth from K–12 education on the ground that they were uneducable because of their purported intellectual disabilities. Equality doctrine mistakenly insists that we consider these youth to be “Black” or “disabled” when understanding their constitutional rights. Abandoning the disability silo can help make broader claims for both racial and disability justice, including support for affirmative opportunities for all groups that have faced a history of subordination. It can also reveal the wildly nonoriginalist methodology underlying the Court’s purported reliance on originalism.