How Work Culture Impacts Brand Reputation

Work culture has been defined as “the interactions of all employees which in the aggregate creates a picture of how things get done and what matters inside the organization” (Gebler 2017). Culture, at a point, intersects with brand reputation in that it can be considered two sides of the same coin. Reputation comes from the external belief of your company behavior, while culture is how people inside your company behave and reaffirm those beliefs.

Earlier this month, we held a thought-provoking session that explored how work culture and impacts brand reputation, specifically exploring the conversation from the perspective of academics and business leaders.

Session presenters included:

  • David Gebler, of Indiggo, Washington, DC has over twenty years’ experience working with global organizations on how to reduce people based risks while improving productivity and corporate reputation. Named as one of America’s top Thought Leaders in Trustworthy Business Behavior.
  • Dennis Hirsch, Professor of Law and Director of the Program on Data and Governance at The Ohio State University. In 2010, he served as a Fulbright Senior Professor at the University of Amsterdam where he produced a leading study on Collaborative Dutch data protection regulation.
  • Bob Bowman, Director Risk Management, The Wendy’s Corporation. Bob has a diverse risk management background with Macy’s for many years and since 2014 with Wendy’s. Bob’s background and responsibility include enterprise risk, business continuity, data and privacy risk management.
  • Lowell (Chip) Howard, Jr., Honda North America, Inc. Chip is General Counsel- Manufacturing at Honda North America and has responsibility for HNA Law Division’s offices in Ohio, Alabama, Indiana and South Carolina.

At its core, culture and brand reputation have effective leaders and leadership as an underlying foundational element.  From that core, effective leaders develop engaged employees who develop loyal customers.

The impact of Big Data on culture and brand reputation begins with what Professor Hirsch refers to as the Three V’s: volume, velocity and variety.  The fourth attribute is correlation.  The use of big data can bring great benefit, but also significant risk to a brand. A now classic example is when Target figured out that a teen girl was pregnant before her father did.

The Target Example

Target assigns every customer a Guest ID number, tied to their credit card, name, or email address that becomes a bucket that stores a history of everything they’ve bought and any demographic information Target has collected from them or bought from other sources. (Forbes) Target then uses this data to create highly personalized marketing materials.

In the case with the pregnant teen, she received a mailer containing only advertisements for baby products. Her father saw the mailer and become enraged, as he thought that Target was encouraging her to become a teen mother. After some back and forth with his local Target’s management, where Target apologized for the error, the father returned to the store and informed management that his daughter was indeed expecting.

Target and many other companies continue to utilize big data in order to generate a customized consumer experience. But now, in order to mitigate the risk of revealing consumer secrets and just generally spooking people, Target incorporates those customized advertisements in with the regular circulars.

Big data certainly has massive benefits for companies and the consumer when applied thoughtfully and strategically, but can create headaches for brands when used too liberally.

Thinking Practically

Bob Bowman and Chip Howard engaged the audience in discussion about how their respective companies leverage positive company culture towards a positive brand image.

At Wendy’s, culture and values are everything, going all the way back to Dave Thomas, the company’s founder. Bowman expounded on some of the trials Wendy’s have been through over the years — from fingers in chili to viral Frosty videos — and how Wendy’s leveraged its brand equity and relied on culture to see them through varying crises.

Values inform culture at Honda too, in the form of the three joys — the joy of buying, the joy of selling, and the joy of creating — and respect for the individual. Howard explained to participants that every Honda employee are encouraged to “find their Honda joy” because Honda believes that when associates work towards their own happiness first, the company will grow as a result.

Takeaways

  • Brand reputation and company culture are two sides of the same coin.
  • Effective leaders develop engaged employees which ultimately lead to loyal customers. At the core is effective leadership.
  • In managing big data and big data analytics risk, we must be careful to consider the potential impacts of the data, the correlation of the data, how that data could profile and what predictions can be made using the data.
  • Significant benefit can exist from the big data analytics. Risks, however, are present to include privacy violation, legal and regulatory, as well as the consequential brand and values impact.
  • Wendy’s core belief is that their success is based on the relationship with the customer. The foundation is food, which relationship is enhanced or eroded by behavior and trust is earned when both are delivered in a predictable consistent manner.
  • The Honda philosophy is built on a foundation of respect for the individual. From that fundamental belief, they believe that;
    • Initiative — Associates should not be bound by preconceived ideas.
    • Equality — Recognize and respect individual differences in one another and treat each other fairly.
    • Trust — The associate relationship should be based on mutual trust.

The Risk Institute at The Ohio State University’s Fisher College of Business exists to bridge the gap between academia and corporate America. By combining the latest research with the real-world expertise of America’s most forward-thinking companies, the Risk Institute isn’t just reporting risk management’s current trends — it’s creating tomorrow’s best practices.

Resilient By Design

In our interconnected, 21st century global economy, unexpected— black swan— events in one corner of the globe can have a ripple effect through global supply chains and impact customers like we have not seen in the history of global trade. In a January 24 session on supply chain resilience, we explored how companies who are prepared for such events can come out stronger and thrive, while others who may be less prepared or not at all, risk significant impact to revenue, brand and at the extreme, the very viability of the underlying business.

Session presenters included:

  • Joseph Fiksel, Executive Director of the Sustainable and Resilient Economy program at The Ohio State University and a faculty member in Integrated Systems Engineering. Dr. Fiksel is an international expert in sustainability and resilience with over 25 years experience in the space.
  • Keely Croxton, Associate Professor of Logistics at The Ohio State University. Dr. Croxton has a developed expertise in supply chain resilience, focused on helping companies balance their inherent vulnerabilities with their management capabilities in order to effectively mitigate disruptions in the supply chain.
  • Darrell Zavitz, Vice President (Retired) Shared Services/Supply Chain, The Dow Chemical Company. During his tenure with Dow, Darrell drove best practices into each of Dow’s businesses including Resilience, Six Sigma/Lean, and Network Design.

Between 1900 and 2010 global natural disasters have grown exponentially, arguably impacted by climate, global crowding and connectivity. With the frequency of black swan events accelerating, the traditional COSO Framework for Enterprise Risk Management (Objective Setting, Event Identification, Risk Assessment, Risk Response and Control Activities) is no longer a sufficient means to view the world.

Today, more than ever, risks cannot always be anticipated. The risks may be very hard to quantify and adaptation may be needed to remain competitive. Resilience strategies in turbulent times would suggest that a more comprehensive strategy to the abruptness of change and the magnitude of change is warranted.

Introducing SCRAM™

The SCRAM (Supply Chain Resilience Assessment & Management) Tool™ is based on more than a decade of research at The Ohio State University and was highlighted as an alternative framework allowing companies to focus on balancing vulnerabilities with capabilities. With this balance, a business will achieve balanced resilience and improved performance over time.

An ability to assess vulnerabilities and capabilities, look for gaps and build capabilities is at its basic level the key to building supply chain resilience. The more resilient a firm is, the less likely the firm will see swings in performance.

SCRAM™ in Action

The Dow Chemical Company began SCRAM implementation several years ago. Their focus on supply chain resilience and being agile drove a strategy shift. The project was in three phases:

  • Phase 1:   “Get Fit” | Manage the Cycle
  • Phase 2: “Change the Rules” | Dampen the Cycle
  • Phase 3: “Change the Game” | Break the Cycle.

The approach taken by Dow in its SCRAM implementation began with a rapid qualitative assessment. This included an electronic survey involving 30-40 business resources devoting an hour or so to the assessment. The SCRAM methodology was then used as a filter to prioritize and sequence business urgency (opportunity and commitment). Model those results and follow with and audit to value delivery.

Session Takeaways

  • Risk tolerance and resilience capabilities tend to change as companies grow.
  • Companies need to develop the right portfolio of capabilities to match the vulnerabilities they face.
  • Every disruption presents a learning opportunity.
  • A critical leadership requirement is to develop a culture of resilience in the organization.
  • To maximize return on investment, companies should design for inherent resilience.
  • Measuring and managing enterprise resilience is still an emerging field, ripe for collaboration between industry and academia.