Written by Peggy Kirk Hall, Attorney and Director, Agricultural & Resource Law Program
Written by Tyler Zimpfer, Law Fellow, National Agricultural Law Center
The beginning of a new presidential administration brings heightened awareness to areas of government that Americans don’t always consider, such as federal agencies. Recently, U.S. Senators have been reviewing the President’s nominees in confirmation hearings for leadership roles in federal agencies. These confirmation hearings matter. Nominees – often called a “secretary” or “director” – will oversee federal agencies with billion-dollar budgets and a federal workforce of over three million employees. But why is our government structured this way? Are all federal agencies created the same? What powers do these agencies have? And how might a recent Supreme Court decision impact the future of federal agencies?
These questions are relevant to agriculture, because farmers constantly engage with federal agencies. For example, the USDA administers programs through the Farm Service Agency (FSA) and Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) that provides crop insurance, conservation funding, and financial assistance. The EPA oversees pesticide use, air pollution, and water quality laws that impact chemical use. Food producers and processors comply with health and safety standards set by the Food and Drug Administration and the Food Safety and Inspection Service.
Understanding the laws that establish and guide federal agencies is important for agriculture and is the focus of our third topic in the Principles of Government series.