Farm Office

Ohio Crop Returns Outlook for 2025

Written by Barry Ward, Leader, Production Business Management

Lower crop prices and a mix of higher and lower input costs have set the stage for another challenging profit outlook for Ohio commodity crops in 2025. Supply and demand fundamentals have both continued to negatively affect commodity crop prices. Some input costs are projected to be higher while some are expected to be steady to lower. The result of this set of economic fundamentals is an outlook for low to negative margins for the 2025 corn, soybean and wheat crops.

Production costs for Ohio field crops are forecast to be steady to slightly higher than last year with higher machinery and equipment costs leading the way. Lower crop protection chemical prices are offset by an expected increase in product need. Fuel and crop insurance costs are also projected to be slightly lower but land rents continue to increase on average.

Variable costs for corn in Ohio for 2025 are projected to range from $502 to $614 per acre depending on land productivity. The trend line corn yield (190.1 bpa) scenario included in the corn enterprise budget shows an increase in variable costs of 2.4% with an increase in fixed costs of 3.4% due to higher rents and machinery/equipment costs.

Variable costs for 2025 Ohio soybeans are projected to range from $264 to $298 per acre. Variable costs for trend-line soybeans (56.8 bpa) are expected to decrease 2% in 2025 compared to 2024 while fixed costs are expected to increase 2.9% in 2025. Continue reading Ohio Crop Returns Outlook for 2025 →

The 3rd Annual Cultivating Connections Conference Returns

Written by Robert Moore

We’re excited to announce the 3rd Annual Cultivating Connections Conference, a joint effort between Ohio State University and Iowa State University. This unique event brings together professionals who are dedicated to the critical work of farm transition planning. Whether you are an attorney, accountant, financial advisor, or educator, this conference is designed to provide you with the tools, insights, and connections you need to support farm families as they plan for the future.

The conference will be held at the FFA Enrichment Center in Ankeny, Iowa. In-person registration is $325, and a virtual attendance option is available for $299. The event will take place over two days and will feature a variety of sessions focused on the legal, financial, and family dynamics of transitioning agricultural operations to the next generation.

This year’s agenda features presentations on new legal tools for the farm transition, counseling farm families through succession planning, and understanding how farm program payments impact the transition plan. Additional sessions will include a 2025 tax update for the farm transition, long-term care planning, and a discussion on the concept of fairness versus equality in farm debt. The second day of the conference will provide real-world case studies.

The Cultivating Connections Conference is more than just a learning event. It is a forum for building relationships, exchanging ideas, and strengthening the professional community dedicated to preserving the legacy and sustainability of family farms. Whether you are just entering the field or have years of experience, we invite you to join us for this important event. Come to gain valuable knowledge, share your own insights, and connect with others who are committed to helping farm families succeed across generations.

Registration is now open at: https://www.regcytes.extension.iastate.edu/cultivating/

For questions, contact Robert Moore at moore.301@osu.edu .

Considerations When Using the Prevented Planting Option

By: Eric Richer, Associate Professor and Field Specialist, Farm Management, OSU Extension; Carl Zulauf, Professor Emeritus, OSU Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics; and Aaron Wilson, Assistant Professor and Field Specialist, Ag Weather and Climate, OSU Extension

According to the May 27 Crop Progress Report by USDA National Ag Statistics Service, Ohio had only 54% of corn planted, well behind the 5-year average of 73% planted. In 2024, 74% was planted by this report date. In 2019, a year with significant planting delay, only 22% of the corn had been planted by this report date. In that year, the wettest spring conditions were confined to northwest Ohio. In contrast, much more of the state has received well above average precipitation in 2025, with areas near the Ohio River and northeast Ohio seeing the largest difference compared to normal.

The lag in corn planting progress this year has prompted increasing interest in evaluating the Prevented Planting option available through multi-peril crop insurance. The purpose of this article is to walk through the options, mechanics, and economics of electing prevented planting for your corn crop utilizing 2025 values.

We are not crop insurance agents, so our most important message is that for those thinking about prevented planting talk sooner rather than later with your insurance agent.

In Ohio, June 5 is the date at which prevented planting becomes an electable option.  For soybeans, the date is June 20.

As of June 5, a farmer who has individual farm yield (YP) and revenue (RP and RP-HPE) insurance for corn has 3 basic options: Continue reading Considerations When Using the Prevented Planting Option →

Gifting to Manage Estate Taxes

Written by Robert Moore

The federal estate tax exemption is set to drop dramatically in 2026—from $13.99 million in 2025 to an estimated $7–$7.5 million per person. For some farm families, this shift could result in significant estate tax exposure. While most estates won’t exceed the new limit, some farmers, especially those with high-value farmland or appreciating assets, will find themselves suddenly at risk of federal estate taxes.

Gifting is one strategy to reduce the size of your taxable estate, but it’s not always simple or risk-free. Let’s explore when gifting can help, when it might not, and what to watch out for.

Two Types of Gifts

There are two main gifting categories under federal law:

  • Annual Exclusion Gifts – In 2025, you can gift up to $19,000 per recipient ($38,000 for couples) annually without using any of your lifetime exemption.
  • Lifetime Credit Gifts – Larger gifts are allowed, but they reduce your lifetime estate tax exemption.  The lifetime estate tax exemption is the amount of wealth that the IRS exempts from estate taxes.  The exemption can be used at death, gifted away during life, or a combination of the two.

Example: If a parent gifts a $1,019,000 farm to a child, the first $19,000 is exempt from taxes and does not reduce the parent’s estate tax exemption.  The remaining $1,000,000 reduces the parent’s lifetime estate tax exemption from $13.99 million to $12.99 million.

Continue reading Gifting to Manage Estate Taxes →

How Do We Pay for Long-Term Care Without Losing the Farm?

Written by Robert Moore

I recently received this question from a farm family. It’s one of the most common — and important — questions farm families ask when thinking about the future. Long-term care (LTC) is expensive, unpredictable, and often not covered by programs like Medicare. For farmers who’ve spent a lifetime building an operation and want to pass it on, the rising costs of LTC present a real financial risk to the land, the farm business, and the legacy. The following is a brief discussion on LTC costs and strategies.

The Growing Risk of Long-Term Care

Once upon a time, estate taxes were the biggest financial threat to the family farm. Today, that’s no longer the case. With higher federal estate tax exemptions, few farms owe estate taxes anymore. The real financial threat now? LTC costs.

LTC includes a wide range of services — from home-based personal care to skilled nursing facility stays — and most of it isn’t covered by Medicare. These services help people with chronic illness, disability, or aging-related conditions. For example, assistance with dressing, bathing, eating, or even just getting around. Care might start at home and eventually move to a facility. Costs vary by setting and service, but they add up quickly.

Here are a few important facts to help understand the implications of LTC on farming operations:

  • 69% of people over 65 will need some form of LTC.
  • Average LTC lasts 3 about years, with women needing slightly more (3.7 years) than men (2.2 years).
  • 20% of people will need care for more than 5 years — these are the “outliers” most likely to face LTC costs that can jeopardize the farm.
  • In Ohio, a year in a nursing home will cost around $100,000 or more.
  • For a farm couple, those numbers can double — and the risk of outliving income and savings increases.

Continue reading How Do We Pay for Long-Term Care Without Losing the Farm? →

Ohio legislators introduce carbon capture and storage bills

Written by Peggy Kirk Hall, Attorney and Director, Agricultural & Resource Law Program

As expected, proposed legislation to allow for carbon capture and storage wells (CCS) was introduced this week in the Ohio General Assembly.  The legislation opens the door for CCS underground injection wells to store captured carbon dioxide in “pore space” or cavities far beneath the land’s surface. As we explained in Part 1 and Part 2 of our CCS series, CCS technology removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and can also trigger final production in an oil or gas field. If passed, the new law would affect agricultural landowners, who could be asked to lease their “pore space” for CCS projects.

The identical CCS bills introduced in the Ohio House of Representatives and Senate are H.B. 170, sponsored by Rep. Monica Robb Blasdel (R-Columbiana) and Rep. Bob Peterson (R-Sabina) and S.B. 136, sponsored by Sen. Tim Schaffer (R-Lancaster) and Sen. Brian Chavez (R-Marietta). The proposal varies in several places from a bill introduced late last year, the result of “fine tuning” by interested parties over the winter, according to Rep. Blasdel.

The proposed legislation includes clarification of the pore space property interest, a regulatory framework and fees for injection wells, consolidation or “pooling” provisions, well closure procedures, and liability provisions for carbon dioxide migration. Continue reading Ohio legislators introduce carbon capture and storage bills →

How Inadequate Estate Planning Led to the Likely Sale of a Family Farm

Written by Robert Moore

As we all know, family farms often hold deep sentimental value. They are passed from generation to generation, with the hope that they will stay in the family. But without careful estate planning, these properties can become the subject of costly legal disputes—and even forced sales. A recent case from the Ohio Court of Appeals, Stephan v. Wacaster, is a textbook example of how inadequate planning can lead to the partition and sale of family land.

The Case: A Family Farm Divided

In Stephan v. Wacaster, the appeals court affirmed a decision forcing the partition[1] of a 95-acre farm in Miami County, Ohio. Here’s what happened:

Margaret Stephan, the original owner of the farm, left a will giving life estates to her two children, Connie Wacaster and DeWayne Stephan. Upon each of their deaths, the will directed that their respective shares would pass to their children. For DeWayne’s half, that meant his sons, Rick and Chris Stephan. For Connie’s half, her children, Tami Bodie and Todd Wacaster, would inherit.

Both Margaret and DeWayne passed away. Rick and Chris, now owning DeWayne’s one-half of the farm, filed a lawsuit seeking to partition the farm and divide the proceeds. Connie, still living and holding her life estate in half the property, objected. She argued that because she was still alive and held a life estate over the whole farm, the property couldn’t be partitioned until her death. Continue reading How Inadequate Estate Planning Led to the Likely Sale of a Family Farm →

BOI is Back!

Written by Jeffrey K. Lewis, Esq., Program Coordinator, Income Tax Schools

Yes, you read that right—the Beneficial Ownership Information (“BOI”) reporting requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) are once again in effect. On February 17, 2025, a federal judge lifted the stay he had issued on January 7 in Smith v. U.S. Department of Treasury, which had temporarily halted the Government from enforcing BOI reporting requirements nationwide. This recent ruling eliminates all nationwide barriers that had been hindering the enforcement of the CTA. As a result, millions of businesses must now comply with BOI reporting requirements or face the risk of civil and/or criminal penalties.

Updated Deadlines
On February 18, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued a notice outlining the following key updates:

  1. Most reporting companies, unless subject to a later deadline (such as disaster relief extensions), now have until March 21, 2025, to submit their initial, updated, or corrected BOI report to FinCEN.
  2. If FinCEN determines that additional time is needed for compliance, it will issue another notice before the March 21, 2025, deadline with any further changes.
  3. The named plaintiffs in National Small Business United v. Yellen are still not required to report their BOI to FinCEN at this time.

Continue reading BOI is Back! →

How Many Farms Pay Estate Taxes?

Written by Robert Moore

Estate taxes have been a hot topic lately, especially with the looming expiration of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The TCJA significantly increased the federal estate tax exemption, which stands at $13.99 million per person for 2025. However, if Congress does not intervene, that exemption will drop to approximately $7.2 million in 2026, reverting to pre-TCJA levels.

Estate Taxes and Farms: The Current Reality

Despite the frequent debate about estate taxes, very few farm estates actually owe them. According to the USDA, only about 0.3% of farm estates are subject to federal estate tax under the current exemption. In fact, in 2022, the USDA estimates only 87 farm estates nationwide had to pay any federal estate tax at all.

If the exemption decreases in 2026, more farms will be affected, but the overall percentage will still be relatively small. Here’s what the numbers look like:

  • The percentage of all farms owing estate taxes would rise from 0.3% to 1.0%.
  • Large farms (those with $1 million to $5 million in gross income) would see the biggest jump, with taxable estates increasing from 2.8% to 7.3%.

See the chart below for a full breakdown.

Why Estate Taxes Matter for Farm Families

Even though only a small percentage of farms will be affected, for those that are, estate taxes can pose a significant challenge to passing the farm on to the next generation. Many farms are asset-rich but cash-poor, meaning they have substantial land and equipment value but limited liquid assets. This can create difficulties in paying estate taxes without selling off land or assets critical to farm operations. Continue reading How Many Farms Pay Estate Taxes? →

From Paper to Pixels: Do Emojis Count as Electronic Signatures?

Written by Jeffrey K. Lewis, Esq., Program Coordinator, Income Tax Schools

Traditional communication methods are a thing of the past. With instant access to email, social media, text messages, websites, and video calls, digital communication is now the primary way individuals and organizations connect. In this digital age, emojis have become a key form of expression. Traditional contracts, once reliant on handwritten signatures, have now expanded to include electronic signatures under federal and state law. But can a simple thumbs-up emoji or smiley face be seen as legally binding consent in a contractual agreement? Recent legal trends suggest that in certain circumstances, the answer may be yes. Producers should be aware of the potential legal risks emojis pose when negotiating a contract through digital communications.

Legal Landscape of Electronic Signatures

  • Federal E-Sign Act: The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (“E-Sign Act”), enacted in 2000, ensures that electronic records and signatures are legally valid, provided they meet certain requirements. The law explicitly states that electronic contracts and signatures cannot be denied enforceability solely because they are digital. Under the E-Sign Act, an electronic signature is broadly defined as any “electronic sound, symbol, or process” associated with a contract and executed with intent.
  • Ohio’s UETA: Ohio has adopted the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“UETA”), which complements the E-Sign Act and provides additional guidance on electronic contracts within the state. UETA establishes that electronic signatures and records hold the same legal validity as their paper counterparts (with limited exceptions), as long as both parties have agreed to conduct transactions electronically. Like the E-Sign Act, UETA does not explicitly address emojis. However, given its broad definition of electronic signatures, emojis could qualify if used with the intent to agree to contract terms.
  • Industry Standards: Additionally, certain industries may have standards that deal with digital communications. For example, within the grain trade, a responsive emoji texted to a purchaser might be deemed sufficient “confirmation” under the National Grain and Feed Association’s (“NGFA”) Grain Trade Rules. These rules require written confirmation, which can be sent via postal mail, courier, or electronic means. Since the rules do not expressly exclude emojis as a form of electronic communication, their validity remains an open question.

Judicial Treatment of Emojis and Digital Communications in Contract Law
While Ohio courts have yet to issue a definitive ruling on emojis as contractual acceptance, there is case law that addresses the issue of digital communications and the use of emojis to create a legally enforceable contract. Continue reading From Paper to Pixels: Do Emojis Count as Electronic Signatures? →