Eman

  • What disease might you want your device to be able to diagnose?
    • How about rather than testing for a particular disease, we test for a particular quality to see if it’s normal or not.
      • Can test for multiple diseases in the same category at once
  • Want to test something that will be visible in a blood sample
  • What are some things that are visible in blood?
    • Blood cell count
    • Tumor markers
    • Proteins
    • Hemoglobin
    • Red blood cells
    • White blood cells
    • Platelets
    • Iron-deficiencies
    • Cholesterol
    • Many other things
      • Will want to choose something that interests all group members; once that is done, we will want to research how they appear in the blood/how to measure them, what the normal ranges/characteristics are, and how to get our device to measure that particular quality.
  • What type of analyte will your device assess?
    • Depends on what we decide to measure/test for
    • Most of the things I’ve listed above measure a range/number
      • Will want to have the device recognize what a protein is, or whatever it is that we test for, and then have a counter to keep track of how many/much there is
      • Could be shape, DNA, cell surface proteins, patterns, variability in structure, structure in general, or any number of things
  • How will the patient blood sample and reagents be loaded into the NANOLYSER?
    • I would think that we would want to do something similar to micro
      • Have a channel that the sample goes into
      • All of the different parts of the chip that need some of the sample can just be connected to the larger channel
      • Maybe we could just place a drop somewhere onto the chip
      • Dip the chip into the sample
  • How will samples and reagents be moved around in the NANOLYSER?
    • Again, I think something similar to micro
      • Use flow
        • Have a channel that all of the different chambers of the chip are attached to
        • Insert the sample into the channel
        • As the sample flows, it will go into the different chambers
      • Or we can manually insert and take out the sample from the different parts of the chip
  • Will you isolate the target analyte from the other blood components? Or will you analyze directly from whole blood? Thoughts on how and/or why?
    • Isolating target analyte vs Whole Blood
      • If we go with the test for irregularities rather than a particular disease idea, then it will be better to analyze directly from whole blood
      • It will probably be easier to analyze directly from whole blood
      • Since we are super inexperienced in targeting analytes, room for error will be much greater than just analyzing directly from whole blood
      • Isolating a target analyte will probably take more time than just analyzing from whole blood
      • I just want to analyze directly from whole blood because I think it will be easier
  • What might be some of the different processing steps your device will need to be able to perform?
    • Cell separation
    • Cell labeling
    • Protein labeling
    • DNA labeling
    • Cell counting
    • Structure identification
    • Chemical identification
    • Structure counting
    • Chemical measurements
  • Will these be performed in the same location on the chip or in different chambers?
    • Will probably want to perform them in different chambers because the results will be more organized if everything is already separated into its specific category
      • This will probably lead to a slightly larger chip
  • How will the results be read or detected to determine the diagnosis given by your device?
  • Not really sure what this question means.
    • How will the device read the sample or how will the user read the results?
      • Given:
        • Fluorescence reader
        • Electrical signal
        • Chemical change
      • Ideas:
        • Maybe we can connect the chip to a Proteus and have the Proteus display the results
        • Could do the same thing with a computer
          • Then we would have to develop a code, which would probably take a really long time
        • We could develop a program to graph the results and the expected results, highlighting areas of concern
        • Can have the chip add something to the sample to show that it passes with flying colors or is in the danger zone
        • Send samples to different part of the chip according to whether or not they are healthy
  • Disposable vs Reusable
  • Disposable:
    • Pros
      • It’s okay if our design is crummy because we’ll be making another one
      • Can test a variety of different designs
      • Can slightly alter the same design to test for different aspects/different diseases
      • Won’t be as big of a deal if one teammate messes everything up on accident (I tend to be that teammate).
    • Cons
      • Could take a lot of time to make the designs
      • Would use up more materials/cost more money
      • Could have confounding variables when comparing results between the same disease that’s being tested for in multiple designs
  • Reusable:
    • Pros
      • Won’t have to come up with multiple designs
      • Won’t have to waste time/money for new designs to be made
      • There will be consistency in testing
      • Will be built to withstand time, so can be used to demo future classes
    • Cons
      • If the design sucks, we are stuck with a crummy LOC
      • Can’t really change the chip once it’s made
      • Will have to either allow for multiple areas of testing in the design, or be stuck with only testing one thing

FullSizeRender (3)