Over the last five days, I have explored various museums and memorials within the limits of Berlin, Germany and its suburbs. Examples of such places include the Soviet War Memorials, the Wannsee House, the Topography of Terror Museum, the Olympic Stadium, Sachsenhausen concentration camp, the German Historical Museum, the Russian/German Museum, the Fuhrer-bunker, and the site of the Potsdam Conference. Compared to its counterparts in England and France, the Berlin sites concentrated much more heavily on not only the early consolidation of National Socialist power but also the expansionism of the Third Reich through annexations and invasions. Particularly, I found both the Topography of Terror Museum and the Wannsee House to be the most fascinating of all places our group visited.
Built on the ruins of the former Gestapo/SS headquarters, the Topography of Terror Museum thoroughly documented the rise of Heinrich Himmler and his Schutzstaffel to national prominence. Having extensively studied Himmler and his SS/police task force for our seminar class, I already had an intellectual head start on my fellow students going through the exhibit. Despite this advantage, it took me almost twice as long as everyone else to get through the numerous displays because of the abundance of documents regarding the Nazi leaders that I did not have available during my research. While the museum did not really teach me anything new regarding either Himmler’s ascent or the establishment of the Reich Main Security Administration, it did bring to the light the horrors committed by the SS and Police in individual countries. This successfully portrayed just how deadly and brutal World War II was for every European country in terms of the racially prejudiced German invaders.
Additionally, the Wannsee House, the infamous location of the conference regarding the implementation of the Final Solution, impressed me. This was mostly due to the wonderful tour guide that led us through the grounds. The Final Solution to the Jewish Question constituted a significant portion of my thesis on Himmler’s impact on the Nazi regime. Therefore, I had a premature belief on the significance of the Wannsee Conference. I found myself stifled by the opinions of our tour guide regarding which Nazi she believed was most responsible for the Holocaust. Because her choice of Joseph Goebbels contrasted to mine of Heinrich Himmler, I took what she said incredibly serious as to see where her proof was. She never supported her hypothesis, so I intend to email her as soon as time permits. Seeing the actual room in which Heydrich, Muller, and Eichmann stressed the logistical implementation of the Holocaust to other Nazi officials was surreal. Earlier in the semester, I read a wonderful book by Christopher Browning on the Final Solution, and Wannsee Conference was a central focus. It was indeed frightening to see the actual location in person rather than just reading about it thousands of miles away in Columbus.
Overall, I considered the historical museums in Berlin to be the most interesting because they showed a more nationalistic interpretation of the Nazi war machine and its influences on the Holocaust. Furthermore, the post-war influences of the Soviet Union within a divided Germany were evident through both the memorials to fallen Russian soldiers and the presence of a German/Russian museum, which focused on the unstable relationship of the two powers in the mid twentieth century. While Berlin may not have been the prettiest or most lively of cities we visited, it definitely had historical museums with the most thorough and accurate information.