During my Autumn 2018 semester, I set tangible goals for myself that I wanted to reach by the end of this past school year. One of those goals was to apply, get accepted, and find ways to reduce the cost of an education abroad program. Given that I am in the School of Environment and Natural Resources (SENR), I am required to have at least one experiential learning trip abroad. I began doing research into programs that would allow me to receive academic credit towards my degree but also for ones that aligned with my interests in sustainability and community development. I searched through the Office of International Affairs website and found quite a few programs, but I really found what I was looking for when I went to the education abroad webpage for the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences (CFAES). I found quite a few programs there that piqued my interest but many of them were far out of my price range. Unfortunately, as an out-of-state student, these education abroad trips are still priced with out-of-state tuition so pricing was definitely a barrier to entry. I spoke with Amanda Laser in SENR who helped me identify possible trips, their application deadlines, and price ranges. She informed me about the new trip to Panama through CFAES and about the steps taken to make the trip affordable for students who might have barriers to entry. After attending the information sessions for this education abroad trip, I applied knowing it would be my first experience out of the country. This was a nerve-wracking experience for me because as a first-generation college student, it is difficult to navigate these experiences that deal with money and traveling. However, things began to fall into place after I was accepted into the program. I was able to figure out financial assistance that significantly reduced the already subsidized cost of the program and I was able to set myself up for a transformational experience abroad.
Other than the subsidized cost and a program that aligned with my interests, one of the reasons why I applied to this trip was so I could finally experience what it would be to visit a Latin American country. This trip to Panama was my first time out of the country, never even having visited a place I would like to call home in Puerto Rico. Prior to the program, I wanted to be able to begin forming what my Latinx identity meant to me and I felt traveling abroad to another Latin American country would allow me to do that.
Prior to the trip one of my biggest anxieties was my Spanish speaking abilities. Both of my parents are Puerto Rican but decided to not teach my siblings and I Spanish as our first language. Growing up, we got English and Spanglish. Being that I was born and raised on the mainland U.S., it was anxiety-inducing to imagine myself being thrown into the Spanish speaking arena. My experience growing up Latinx in the U.S. was one where if you didn’t speak Spanish you weren’t Latino enough or you were becoming too assimilated. When in Panama, I found that there was a very different attitude towards people who attempted to speak Spanish or appeared to be of a Latinx identity. I often ended up in conversations with people who referred to me as their cousin or using slang that would essentially mean someone who is familiar. To my surprise, my ear picked up on the language very quickly. I was able to understand a lot more than I thought I would even though I sometimes struggled to find the correct conjugation of words.
One of my favorite parts of the trip was visiting the Fab Lab. I come from a vocational and technical training background so being able to see how that platform is growing beyond high school education and being used as a community development piece was truly interesting. When touring the Fab Lab, I remember looking around and thinking about the potential building one of these has in my hometown. However, instead of thinking of it as just a place for others to come in and work on their own projects, I was thinking about using the Fab Lab infrastructure as a way to divert waste. One of the projects we saw at the Fab Lab was a chair that was made of some old metal, a wooden seat, and an old computer keyboard as the seat back. There was also a light fixture that diffused light through plastic bottle caps. I immediately thought of our recycling issue and how many Asian countries are no longer accepting our recyclable products and how a Fab Lab type facility would allow these products to be upcycled into pieces of art, furniture, or tools that can be made or sold for economic development.
Another part of the trip I truly enjoyed was the Lo TuYo organic farm. I have a bit of experience with organic urban farming so being able to see organic farming on a larger rural scale was very interesting to me. I had an employment opportunity at a non-profit that worked on providing fresh and organic produce to food deserts. Lo TuYo was similar in the sense that they provided the hub for local farmers to come and learn about organic practices and sell their produce to the community. It was interesting to learn about the different levels of organic in the U.S. that seemed to be frowned upon in Panama where they preferred their produce as organic as possible.
As someone who grew up in a densely populated, urban area of Northern New Jersey, I had to step out of my comfort zone when we visited the dairy farms. I had never been that close to cows before, and I certainly have never witnessed milk being harvested from them. Although it was hard for me to grasp the complete interest in dairy farming, I will say I was able to gain a new appreciation for where my dairy comes from and the processes that go behind ensuring my product is safe and ready. Given that we had some trip participants who had experience with dairy farming, I took it as an opportunity to learn about an industry I would have never imagined having the opportunity to observe. I was able to ask questions to both the Panamanian dairy farmers and to my group members who knew what the processes were like in the U.S. Another challenge for me was the day we went to the University of Panama. For similar reasons of never being exposed due to my urban upbringing, I had to step out of my comfort zone when entering the facility where the pigs were kept. I had never been that close to pigs and I will say the smell was not pleasant, to say the least. I was able to overhear conversations between my group members about differences between practices in Panama and the U.S. and I can say that I definitely have an appreciation for the industry that provides meat for my consumption.
A key takeaway from engaging in conversation about the meat industries in the U.S. had to do with the notions that livestock are the biggest contributors to greenhouse gasses. On this trip, I learned that it is not the livestock themselves but the industries behind producing and transporting these livestock. That piece of knowledge gained placed my mind into a whirlwind of thoughts of readdressing how I thought of environmental issues pertaining to livestock. It was a field I was fairly ignorant about to begin with, but this allowed me to think of ways to create cleaner transportation methods and tools for harvesting these livestock.
During this trip, I found myself using my Puerto Rican lens to find similarities between Panamanian and Puerto Rican culture, food, and language. Particularly with culture and clothing, I found that the traditional men’s dress shirt called the guayabera was both called the same name and used for similar occasions. Starting with food, the food in Panama was amazing and I often found myself eating food that others did not want or could not have due to dietary restrictions. The national soup of Panama is called sancocho, and in Puerto Rican culture, we also have sancocho. However, it was interesting to taste the different iterations of this soup. In Panama, sancocho is more of a chicken soup with yucca but in Puerto Rican culture, sancocho is made more so with beef corn and potatoes or yucca. One of the first things I picked up on was the difference in color too, where Panamanian sancocho is more of a yellow color and Puerto Rican sancocho is a darker orange. Another food that is found in both cultures but is made differently are the plantains. In Panama, the fried plantains are seasoned with cinnamon to give them more of a warm taste and in Puerto Rico, they are seasoned with our version of seasoning salt. Something interesting with the food was even the differences in what certain foods were called. In Puerto Rico, we have this wild growing fruit called the quenepa, or Spanish lime. In Panama, they also have the same fruit, but it is called a mamon. Another food that is found in both cultures but called different names is the fried mashed plantain. In Panama, they call those patacones and in Puerto Rican culture we call them tostones.
Similarly related to food, during our trip, we had the opportunity to visit the La Dona Pineapple plantation. On these visits, I was viewing and learning through my community development lens and found out that this 117-hectare pineapple plantation one started out as a one-hectare pineapple experiment by Edna Vergara. Over the course of 25 years, Edna was able to grow her business along with 55 other local growers to construct Panama’s first pineapple export facility. Edna was the first women ever to receive Panama’s Agriculture Person of the Year honor and she continues to inspire women and influence Panamanian agriculture as president of the National Export Association. Today, the plantation is run by her son, Paul, who is working to empower, encourage, and educate women all throughout the Panama Oeste province by providing employment opportunities in the production process and agribusiness sector. Not only were the pineapples the best I ever had, but Paul and his operation are working to continue building on Edna’s legacy of community development and women empowerment.
Another component of community development that truly sparked my interest was when we visited Instituto Nacional de Agricultura (INA). INA is an academic institute partnered with the Ministry of Agriculture with the goal to educate rural students on agricultural practices that target food insecurity throughout the country. INA provides scholarships and opportunities for low-income rural students to receive an education they otherwise wouldn’t have access to. Post-graduation from INA, students we spoke with aspired to attend university in Costa Rica and Brazil to hopefully take what they learn and bring it back to their communities. Also, the coffee farm we visited in Boquete taught me about direct trade initiatives versus fair trade. Both systems were set in place to promote environmental protection, economic sustainability, and the rights of laborers and farmers. At this visit I learned about the benefits of direct trade over fair trade in that direct trade ensures that the money gets to the hands that actually picked the coffee. Fairtrade works better to address economic volatility for producers and purchasers but not necessarily those who pick the coffee. Direct trade also ensures that the coffee would retain the authenticity of its origin flavor.
One of my biggest takeaways from a development standpoint was how can we create a market for Eco-Tourism in Panama that won’t suffer due to excess trash buildup. This is often a double-edged sword as Eco Tourism can also promote wasteful tendencies. However, at some of the hotels we stayed at, I took note of environmentally friendly initiatives particularly with the packaging of soaps and the towel reusing programs. I noticed soaps being packaged in biodegradable wrapping and signage in hotel rooms that mentioned reusing any towel that is not on the floor. Although the hotels had some of these environmentally friendly initiatives aimed to keep trash from their facilities, it was not enough to curb the trash being found on hiking trails, and along rivers that are used for whitewater rafting. Expanding those observations further and we think of where these plastic wastes originate from ultimately ending back at big industry. Often times when engaging in conversation about recycling or waste habits, one often uses the phrase “vote with your dollar.” As lovely as it would be to choose products that don’t come wrapped in plastic and to choose biodegradable alternatives, it is important to note that having the financial ability to make that choice is a privilege. Individual choices will not make a huge dent in plastic ending up in waterways when the biodegradable alternatives are always more expensive. Individual actions will not stop big industries from producing plastic and it will take other corporate powers with economic and political influence demanding a change. Grassroots campaigns are great when you have the financial privilege to purchase and demand biodegradable products.
When majoring in EEDS, you are taught the triple bottom line of sustainability. People, planet, and profit are those three factors, but I typically like to throw in purpose as the fourth. To continue developing on “Sustainability” aspect of the program’s title, I think it would be interesting to learn more about gentrification in the country. Sustainability is often linked with development and a lot of our sustainability exposure on the trip was focused on smaller scale community development initiatives. However, when traveling through Panama City or other areas seeing mass scale economic and infrastructural development, we saw the disparities between the haves and the have-nots and I think it would open a lot of eyes to even make that a topic for research or presentation for next year prior to the trip.
This trip allowed me to be a pioneer in many aspects of my life. Not only am I the first in my family to travel out of the country on an education abroad trip, but I was also part of the first group to attend this trip. I was fortunate enough to have this trip be extremely subsidized due to scholarships and I was able to begin formulating what I think it means to be a global citizen. Traveling to a Latin American country allowed me to begin connecting with my Latinx community in a way that I have never before. This was such a positive and transformational experience and I look forward to traveling abroad again in the near future.