Hi everyone-
How’s your pandemic going? I’m keeping busy and healthy so no complaints here 🙂 Why did I choose cannabis? Well, a few years ago I thought it would be interesting to see if cannabis could be of medical use to veterinary patients so I started to educate myself. I’ll admit right off that I’ve learned enough about cannabis to also have a practice called Nevada Veterinary Cannabis, but I have not done anything with it yet. I’m admittedly a bit biased, I suppose.
Back to the blog…in this case, I’m going to look at the toxicological effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol or THC which is the primary psychoactive component of the cannabis plant. We’ll not have time to discuss synthetic cannabinoids which are an entirely different toxicological issue, but here is some information on synthetic cannabinoids.
Cannabis is a complex plant with over 400 chemical entities of which more than 60 of them are cannabinoid compounds, some of them with opposing effects.
What is THC? In this case, we’ll focus on the 2 main ways for humans to ingest THC (ingestion or inhalation).
What is the mechanism of action of THC?
Sources of THC will vary (as will other components present) if it is plant-derived, meaning it contains not only THC, but also the other cannabinoids, terpenes and phytochemicals; or if it is a pharmaceutical formulation.
Marinol (an example of a pharmacological formulation of tetrahydrocannabinol):
Marinol package insert: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2005/018651s021lbl.pdf
THC is widely available in my area. Here’s an image from today from Google:
The onset of action of THC between the different routes of ingestion (inhalation versus oral) differ:
Both the above images from: https://thesunlightexperiment.com/blog/how-is-thc-metabolized
Here’s a nice and recent summary of the toxicokinetics of cannabinoids:
The toxic effects of cannabinoids are secondary to overstimulation of the endocannabinoid system by exogenous cannabinoids. This immoderate stimulation of the endocannabinoid system leads to the aforementioned erratic neurotransmitter modulation that can lead to toxicity. The absorption kinetics of cannabinoids and THC depends on the exposure route, with inhalation reaching peak serum concentrations in less than thirty minutes, and ingestion peaking in concentration at around 2 to 4 hours (or longer) after consumption. Duration of toxicity secondary to inhalation and ingestion lasts approximately 2 to 6 hours and 8 to 12 hours, respectively. THC’s volume of distribution is approximately 3 liters per kilogram, and after exposure eventually collects in fat due to its high lipid solubility. Chronic exposures lead to increased accumulation in fat.
THC crosses the placenta and can accumulate in significantly elevated concentrations in breast milk. The hepatic cytochrome p450 system primarily metabolizes THC to many metabolites, mostly inactive. THC’s main active metabolite is 11-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol which is further broken down to numerous inactive metabolites, including 11-nor-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-carboxylic acid (THC-COOH), which is detectable in urine, as excretion is through both feces and urine over the course of hours to days, with more prolonged elimination depending on the chronicity of use. The toxicokinetics of synthetic cannabinoids are less predictable as the specifically abused compound may vary, and adulteration is not uncommon.
In looking at carcinogenicity of THC, here’s what the CDC website states:
In conclusion, while both tobacco and cannabis smoke have similar properties chemically, their pharmacological activities differ greatly. Components of cannabis smoke minimize some carcinogenic pathways whereas tobacco smoke enhances some. Both types of smoke contain carcinogens and particulate matter that promotes inflammatory immune responses that may enhance the carcinogenic effects of the smoke. However, cannabis typically down-regulates immunologically-generated free radical production by promoting a Th2 immune cytokine profile. Furthermore, THC inhibits the enzyme necessary to activate some of the carcinogens found in smoke. In contrast, tobacco smoke increases the likelihood of carcinogenesis by overcoming normal cellular checkpoint protective mechanisms through the activity of respiratory epithelial cell nicotine receptors. Cannabinoids receptors have not been reported in respiratory epithelial cells (in skin they prevent cancer), and hence the DNA damage checkpoint mechanism should remain intact after prolonged cannabis exposure. Furthermore, nicotine promotes tumor angiogenesis whereas cannabis inhibits it. It is possible that as the cannabis-consuming population ages, the long-term consequences of smoking cannabis may become more similar to what is observed with tobacco. However, current knowledge does not suggest that cannabis smoke will have a carcinogenic potential comparable to that resulting from exposure to tobacco smoke.
It should be noted that with the development of vaporizers, that use the respiratory route for the delivery of carcinogen-free cannabis vapors, the carcinogenic potential of smoked cannabis has been largely eliminated.
Information on carcinogenicity associated with ingestion of THC was not located.
The target organs for THC would be those within the endocannabinoid system (ECS):
Toxicity, from what I have read, is typically associated with the ingestion of excessive amounts of THC.
Here’s an interesting article from the Los Angeles County Public Health Department website:
From a WHO 2018 meeting:
Here’s something interesting that I learned about why some individuals have an aversion response to THC:
From what I can find, one of the earliest medicinal uses of THC was reported approximately 1700 BC:
Treatment for THC intoxication:
MANAGEMENT:
The management of cannabis (marijuana) intoxication consists of supportive care. Because of the differences in toxic manifestations the management differs significantly by age.
Children — Children with cannabis (marijuana) exposure are much more likely to demonstrate severe or life-threatening toxicity consisting of excessive and purposeless motor activity (hyperkinesis) or deep coma. Consultation with a regional poison control center and a medical toxicologist is encouraged for all symptomatic exposures.
Central nervous system depression — Severe central nervous system (CNS) depression from marijuana exposure is unique to the pediatric population and can present with profound depression, lethargy, and coma.
Treatment is supportive and consists of the following measures:
●Maintain airway, breathing, and circulation. Patients with lethargy and coma should receive supplemental oxygen, assessment and support of airway and breathing, and vascular access. Patients with apnea or at risk for aspiration should undergo rapid sequence endotracheal intubation and receive assisted ventilation.
●Measure rapid blood glucose to exclude hypoglycemia.
●Administer naloxone to patients presenting with features of opioid intoxication. Naloxone will not reverse coma due to cannabis toxicity.
The duration of coma is typically one to two days. Full recovery is expected.
Seizures — Seizures have rarely been described after cannabis intoxication in children and may be associated with coingestants (eg, cocaine). Initial treatment of toxin-associated seizures consists of benzodiazepines (eg, lorazepam or midazolam). If seizures persist despite multiple doses of benzodiazepines, then treatment for status epilepticus caused by toxins, as described in the table, is warranted.
Dysphoria — Dysphoria is not a common presentation in pediatric marijuana exposure. However, if symptoms of marked anxiety or agitation develop, benzodiazepines (eg, lorazepam) are frequently effective and have a low adverse effect profile.
Adolescents and adults
Mild intoxication — Mild intoxication with dysphoria is a common presentation in either naïve or chronic marijuana users after ingestion or inhalation of a high-potency product such as an edible or concentrate. Most patients can be managed with a dimly lit room, reassurance, and decreased stimulation. Short-acting benzodiazepines (eg, lorazepam) can be helpful in controlling symptoms of anxiety and have a low side effect profile.
Severe intoxication — Severe physiologic effects are rare after cannabis use and their presence should prompt the clinician to consider coingestion of other recreational drugs, including cocaine, amphetamines, and phencyclidine, or coexisting mental illness.
Marked agitation or combativeness not responsive to reassurance and benzodiazepines may necessitate the use of other medications, depending upon the cause, and is rarely encountered with intoxication from cannabis alone. The approach to sedation of the acutely agitated or violent adult is discussed in detail separately.
Chest pain — Chest pain in association with cannabis use should be managed according to etiology as follows:
●Acute coronary syndrome – Substernal squeezing chest pain suggestive of myocardial ischemia or infarction may occur rarely in association with cannabis use. Patients complaining of chest pain suggestive of coronary insufficiency should be evaluated for acute coronary syndrome and treated accordingly.
●Pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum – Inhalation and breathholding during cannabis use may cause a pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum with sharp, pleuritic chest pain and subcutaneous crepitus. Management of a pneumothorax depends upon its size and includes oxygen administration and, if necessary, evacuation with needle decompression or chest tube insertion.
No specific treatment is necessary for uncomplicated pneumomediastinum.
●Asthma exacerbation – Cannabis use may cause chest tightness with bronchospasm and wheezing. Standard therapy for status asthmaticus should be provided.
Gastrointestinal decontamination — We suggest that patients who ingest cannabis (marijuana) not undergo gastrointestinal decontamination with activated charcoal (AC). After ingestion, most symptoms are delayed up to three hours, which limits the efficacy of AC. Also, the clinical effects of cannabis ingestion are often limited and good outcomes occur with supportive care alone. In addition, in children, clinical toxicity may include rapid onset of altered mental status or vomiting, which may raise the risk of aspiration if AC is administered.
There is no role for gastrointestinal decontamination after toxicity caused by inhaled cannabis.
Cannabis hyperemesis syndrome — Cannabis hyperemesis syndrome is typically seen with chronic marijuana use but can be seen with acute or acute on chronic use. Patients may complain of abdominal pain, vomiting, or nausea that is typically relieved by hot showers. Acute treatment consists of symptomatic care including intravenous fluid hydration, antiemetics (eg, ondansetron), and benzodiazepines. Cessation of marijuana use is also recommended.
Limited observational evidence (case reports and case series) also suggests that topical capsaicin cream (supplied in concentrations of 0.025 to 0.1 percent) applied once in a thin film over the abdomen may improve acute severe abdominal pain and emesis in patients not responsive to ondansetron or benzodiazepines. Evidence is lacking to determine if capsaicin cream has a role for the treatment of chronic symptoms.
In addition, case reports have documented the successful use of haloperidol to abort severe episodes of hyperemesis not responsive to fluid hydration and administration of antiemetics, and benzodiazepines. In one instance, hospital admission was avoided after administration of 5 mg of haloperidol intravenously. However, more evidence is needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this therapy including the indications, dose, and route of administration.
DISPOSITION:
Disposition is determined by several factors including patient age, social circumstances, duration of toxicity, and type of symptoms as follows:
●Children – The duration of symptoms after acute marijuana exposure in children can vary from four to 48 hours depending upon the dose ingested. Patients with persistent vomiting, altered mental status, or excessive, purposeless motor activity (hyperkinesis) warrant hospital admission.
Patients who remain asymptomatic or become asymptomatic following exploratory ingestion of legally acquired cannabis products may be discharged after a brief observation period (eg, four to six hours after ingestion).
Ingestion of illicit marijuana or intentional exposure of a child warrants involvement of a child abuse team, when possible, and should be reported to child protection services.
●Adolescents and adults – Most symptoms after acute marijuana use in adults and adolescents resolve within a few hours and will not require hospital admission.
Hospital admission may rarely be needed for prolonged delirium or agitation requiring repeated doses of benzodiazepines or antipsychotics. These patients should also be screened for substance use disorder, mood disorders, and, if needed, undergo psychiatric consultation and appropriate referrals to substance-use treatment programs.
The disposition for patients with complications of marijuana use depends upon the degree of illness and response to therapy. Patients with proven myocardial infarction or pneumothorax requiring chest tube thoracostomy warrant hospital admission to an appropriate level of care.
Biomarkers and testing:
Testing for tetrahydrocannabinol metabolites can be performed using blood, plasma, urine, oral fluid, hair, sweat, or breath.
Here’s some interesting test results from a 2017 NHTSA Report to Congress:
Here’s a good infographic that summarizes urine testing for THC metabolites:
There is also some information on ways to potentially interfere with testing:
So, overall, this was an interesting bit of reading today and I feel a bit more prepared to discuss THC in a regulatory and testing situation now.