References for GRC 2025

  1. Bagley, C., & Castro-Salazar, R. (2019). Critical arts–based research: a performance of provocation. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(9-10), 945-955.
  2. Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2011). Arts based research. Sage.
  3. Bretz, S. L. (2019). Evidence for the importance of laboratory courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 193-195.
  4. Bretz, S. L. (2001). Novak’s theory of education: Human constructivism and meaningful learning.
  5. Bretz, S. L., Fay, M., Bruck, L. B., & Towns, M. H. (2013). What faculty interviews reveal about meaningful learning in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(3), 281-288.
  6. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Introduction: rhizome. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, 2, 3-25.
  7. Eisner, E. (2008). Art and knowledge. Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues, 4.
  8. Halverson, E., & Sawyer, K. (2022). Learning in and through the arts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(1), 1-13.
  9. Mundy, C. E., & Nokeri, B. K. (2024). Investigating the Effects of a Context-Based Laboratory Exercise for Meaningful Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(8), 3118-3125.
  10. (2022). The equity/excellence imperative: A 2030 blueprint for undergraduate education at research universities. University Press of Colorado.
  11. Sadarangani, I. R., Serafin, J., & Chabra, J. (2024). Student perceptions of meaningful learning in online and hybrid (hands-on/online) laboratories at a large urban university in general and organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(4), 1480-1488.
  12. Strom, K. J., & Martin, A. D. (2017). Becoming-teacher: A rhizomatic look at first-year teaching. Springer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *