My research and teaching center on my substantive interests in public opinion, political behavior, and racial and ethnic politics, with a focus on understanding intra- and inter-group relations in a nuanced fashion. I focus on group identities in the realm of American Politics though the knowledge and methods can be applied across contexts. Moreover, my work can inform public policy and efforts to reduce inequality. I employ a mixed-methods approach in my research, including the use of large-N statistical analysis, developing and conducting original surveys and experiments, and relying on qualitative work via content analyses and in-depth interviews. My research has been supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, an NSF Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant, a Russell Sage Foundation Presidential Award with Mara C. Ostfeld, an APSA Centennial Center Grant, as well as several other fellowships, grants, and awards. Below, I provide more detailed information about a selection of my ongoing projects. Working papers are available upon request.

Please refer to my complete CV for a more comprehensive overview of my research, awards, and experience. Below is a selected list of recent and ongoing projects.

Examining Whites’ Anti-Black Attitudes after Obama’s Presidency with Spencer Piston (Politics, Groups, and Identities, 2019)

Abstract: We develop and test competing theoretical expectations about the level and effects of white prejudice against Blacks in the aftermath of America’s first Black presidency. Using both cross-sectional and panel survey datasets of nationally representative samples of Americans, we find little evidence that any of the following declined during Obama’s presidency: white opposition to Black leaders, white opposition to policies intended to benefit Blacks, white prejudice against Blacks, or the impact of prejudice on white vote choice. Furthermore, the impact of prejudice on policy opinion appears to have increased over this time period, even beyond existing findings indicating a spillover of racialization. These findings suggest that Obama’s rise to power increased whites’ perception that Blacks threaten their dominant position in the United States

Shades of Privilege: The Relationship Between Skin Color and Political Attitudes Among White Americans with Mara C. Ostfeld (Political Behavior, 2020; Replication Files Available Here)

Abstract: Shifting racial dynamics in the U.S. have heightened the salience of White racial identity, and a sense that Whites’ social status and resources are no longer secure. At the same time, the growing size of non-White populations has also renewed attention to skin color-based stratification and the potential blurring of racial boundaries. We theorize that Whites with darker skin will be motivated to protect the boundaries of Whiteness due to the loss of status they would face from blurring racial boundaries. Consistent with growing evidence of skin color’s importance for Whites, we demonstrate that darker-skinned Whites—measured via a light-reflectance spectrophotometer—identify more strongly with their White racial identity and are more likely to hold conservative political views on racialized issues than lighter-skinned Whites. Together, these findings offer new insights into the evolving meaning of race and color in American politics.

Mejorando La Raza?”: Latinos, Skin Color, & Political Preferences with Mara C. Ostfeld (Revise & Resubmit)

Abstract: The meaning of skin color in America has often been understood in the context of Black-White racial divisions. However, as the soon-to-be largest ethno-racial group in the United States, Latinos are positioned to reshape the meaning of color and its relation to a range of consequential outcomes. Drawing upon a survey that incorporates both a newly validated skin color scale as well as spectrophotometer measures of skin color, we provide powerful evidence that politics are deeply intertwined with how Latinos assert their skin color. Latinos who overestimate their lightness(darkness) take less(more) liberal positions on racialized political issues than those who do not overestimate their lightness(darkness). Overall, we illuminate how skin color identification operates as a political statement for many Latinos, as well as how these patterns magnify racialized inequalities in America.