Scoring Table
Success Criteria | Reference | Design A | Design B | Design C |
Cost | 0 | – | 0 | 0 |
Complexity | 0 | – | 0 | 0 |
Weight | 0 | – | + | 0 |
Balance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Originality | 0 | + | – | – |
Sum +’s | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Sum 0’s | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Sum –’s | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Net Score | 0 | -2 | 0 | -1 |
Continue ? | Combine | No | Yes | No |
Screening Table
Reference: Example | Design A: Manta | Design B | Design C | |||||||
Success Criteria | Weight | Rating | Weighted Score | Rating | Weighted Score | Rating | Weighted Score | Rating | Weighted Score | |
Balance | 20% | 2 | 0.4 | 3 | 0.6 | 2 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.4 | |
Weight | 20% | 3 | 0.6 | 2 | 0.4 | 3 | 0.6 | 3 | 0.6 | |
Cost | 5% | 3 | 0.15 | 2 | 0.1 | 3 | 0.15 | 3 | 0.15 | |
Originality | 40% | 1 | 0.4 | 4 | 1.6 | 1 | 0.4 | 1 | 0.4 | |
Complexity | 15% | 3 | 0.45 | 2 | 0.3 | 3 | 0.45 | 3 | 0.45 | |
Total Score | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Continue? | No | Develope | No | No |