As identity and power are topics that everyone should know the boundaries of, the U.K. based turned U.S. remake TV show, The Office, tests these boundaries of respect or immaturity in the Season 3 Episode 1 titled “Gay Witch Hunt”. In this episode Michael, the regional manager of Dunder Mifflin Paper Company, “accidently” outs one of his workers, Oscar, who identifies as a homosexual. Throughout this episode, Michael continually makes comments about Oscar and his sexual orientation. In the end, a meeting is called where Michael forcefully kisses Oscar in front of the office staff to make them believe that he is not against the gay community.
Throughout this episode, viewers are continually reminded about the homophobic actions that happen in many work environments across the world, which I applaud the makers of this show for because it is not an easy task to portray this. Michaels words of, “Faggy”, “can you tell who’s gay and who’s not?” “there’s going to be others” and talk about a “gay-dar” quite literally gives Oscar a negative identity relating to his sexuality. These terms give Oscar the unwanted identity of being less than his peers, the “other”, “different”, and unequal. He feels “different” when Mindy chooses to say, “[it’s] so cool that you’re gay, totally underestimated you”. While when Michael says, “there’s going to be others” he is indirectly othering or singling out Oscar for who he really is on the inside. Much like Simone de Beauvior explains in this paper The Second Sex, “it is not the Other who, in defining [them] self as the Other, established the One.”, Michael sees himself as the One, while putting Oscar into the category of “Other” for being different than himself; Oscar is discriminated against. Michael goes too far in the end to assault Oscar with an unwanted kiss, which further makes Oscar feel ashamed in the workplace where he says he wants to quit his job. In the end, although this show is supposed to be comical, I believe the producers/writers did go a little too far with the identity images in this episode. Through watching this episode, viewers should realize Michael’s ignorant thinking and immature actions are not okay. A clear line between homophobia and workplace humor should be drawn. I would recommend this piece for anyone who wants to learn about identity images from a popular, humorous TV show that crossed the line on this episode.
In the end, I think the producers/writers want viewers to take away the idea of workplace discrimination regarding sexuality. They want viewers to realize that being gay should be celebrated, but they don’t want people to act like Michael Scott did. I would imagine the producers want to challenge the views with this question: How can workplaces become more inclusive to the diversity that is often found in American offices? I believe the producers want to show identity in the sense that it is okay to be gay and to express sexuality freely should someone choose to.