Year in Review

[ “Year in Review”  is where you should reflect on the past year and show how you have evolved as a person and as a student.  You may want to focus on your growth in a particular area (as a leader, scholar, researcher, etc.) or you may want to talk about your overall experience over the past year.  For more information, go to: http://honors-scholars.osu.edu/e-portfolio. Delete these instructions and add your own post.]

G.O.A.L.S.

[ “G.O.A.L.S.” is a place where students write about how their planned, current, and future activities may fit into the Honors & Scholars G.O.A.L.S.: Global Awareness, Original Inquiry, Academic Enrichment, Leadership Development, and Service Engagement. For more information, go to: http://honors-scholars.osu.edu/e-portfolio. Delete these instructions and add your own post.

Global Awareness: Students cultivate and develop their appreciation for diversity and each individual’s unique differences. For example, consider course work, study abroad, involvement in cultural organizations or activities, etc .
Original Inquiry: Honors & Scholars students understand the research process by engaging in experiences ranging from in-class scholarly endeavors to creative inquiry projects to independent experiences with top researchers across campus and in the global community. For example, consider research, creative productions or performances, advanced course work, etc.
Academic Enrichment: Honors & Scholars students pursue academic excellence through rigorous curricular experiences beyond the university norm both in and out of the classroom.
Leadership Development: Honors & Scholars students develop leadership skills that can be demonstrated in the classroom, in the community, in their co-curricular activities, and in their future roles in society.
Service Engagement: Honors & Scholars students commit to service to the community.]

Career

Interviews and My Future Success

Knowledge has been passed down throughout generations as seniors impart their wisdom to their juniors.  To expand my own understanding of concepts such as research and student success, I interviewed multiple senior members of the university to gain from their experiences.  To maximize the effectiveness of my search, I diversified it, interviewing an upperclassman, a graduate student, and a professor.  In this quest, I gained an understanding of the expectations for upperclassmen, graduate students, and student-professor interactions.  As a research university, The Ohio State University places great emphasis on recruiting the best faculty and graduate students conduct research.  Through my interviews, I gained a degree of insight into the research of members of the university.  For an upperclassman, I interviewed Alex Cetnar, a senior in biomedical engineering and my resident advisor (RA).  Alex Cetnar helped me discover ideas about studying methods, student involvement, and selecting the most suitable major.  Next, I could interview my Physics 1250 graduate teaching assistant (GTA), Joseph Adams.  Joseph Adams explained methods to approach professors as well as his techniques to succeed in the classroom.  Unfortunately, the field of computer science and engineering has limited research opportunities for first-year students; therefore, finding a professor was more challenging than I had expected.  Professor James Davis and I discussed his areas of research.

I thought finding suitable candidates for interviews would be a challenge.  Admittedly, interviewing Joseph Adams was the easiest as he is my TA for physics and talked to me during office hours.  While searching for an upperclassman to interview, I asked my RA his major and year; coincidentally, he was both a senior and in the college of engineering and decided to interview him.  Lastly, I was originally going to interview my CSE instructor only to find she was TA.  However, after sending a set of e-mails, I secured an interview with Dr. James Davis, a professor of computer science and engineering within the college.  What originally appeared as a daunting task, interviewing with an upperclassman, GTA, and professor simply required reaching out.

I first interviewed the teaching assistant for my physics class, Joseph Adams.  We discussed ideas about student-faculty interaction, effective ways to study, and how to succeed in college.  Joe’s first suggestion was to talk to professors whose class I was already in, and stop by during office hours to ask a few questions.  I tried to take his advice to talk to my CSE professor, but the circumstances did not lead to an interview.  Next, Joe and I discussed good ways to study for exams, particularly finals.  He said, “prepare as if the test was 4 days earlier.  That way, if you don’t know something, or if an emergency comes up, you won’t be left unprepared.”  This is something I should have considered for my first Physics 1250 midterm, as my performance was rather lackluster.  Finally, we talked about methods to succeed as a college student and prepare for going out into the real world.  Essentially, there is a need to diversify yourself to future employers and/or graduate school programs.  Ideal candidates are well-rounded individuals who have superb interpersonal skills, gotten involved within the university, and a resume reflective of those attributes.  Overall, I learned a lot from Joseph Adams I will apply his tips to pursue my future academic goals.

After interviewing Joe, I had the opportunity to talk to my RA, Alex Cetnar, a fourth-year in the biomedical engineering program.  Like my interview with Joe, we briefly touched on different ways to study and comprehend material.  Alex echoed some of the ideas I got from Joe such as studying well before the test and doing practice problems.  But, Alex brought up that sometimes you cannot always learn enough studying alone.  He introduced the idea of a study group or finding some other external help when preparing for tests.  However, our discussion diverged when Alex told me how he finally decided on a major and his own involvement in college.  Originally, Alex was on a pre-med track through biomedical engineering, but he decided to stay strictly in biomedical after taking a tissue engineering course.  Probably his favorite class, he expounded on the details of the course by giving examples such as how the techniques could regrow some body parts and help them heal faster, acting like a Band-Aid made of tissue.  He summarized that the class proved that the direction he chose to go in was the right one.  Then, Alex brought up his own involvement at the university, being a part of a biomedical society, a religious organization, and Resident Life at The Ohio State University.  And while he said at times it can be difficult, the programs are worth it and a great way to meet like-minded people.  He ended the conversation with one key piece of advice, “You don’t want to spread yourself too thin and half-ass a bunch of things.  It’s better to give it your all in a few things and get more involved with those groups instead.”  These wise words will stick with me as I choose what I want to get involved in at The Ohio State University.

To find scholarly articles, I used the university’s access to the Scopus database, searching specifically for articles written by faculty at The Ohio State University and those related to computer science.  After a few cursory searches, one name frequently appeared: “Davis, J.”  So, I then looked for papers written by him, and I found two related to machine learning, which I subsequently downloaded and read.  Each was incredibly difficult to understand, even the abstract.  I settled on my rather shallow understanding and began to seek an interview with Dr. Davis.

My saga of interviews ended with my discussion with Dr. James Davis, a professor in the college of engineering for computer science and engineering.  Most of our discussion revolved around his research and projects, but he did mention his own college experience.  He explained that after graduating, he wished to pursue a higher-level degree and do research.  After receiving his Ph.D. from MIT, he became a faculty member at The Ohio State University, and has since been promoted to a full professor.  His research focuses on artificial intelligence and machine learning — allowing for simpler data collection and interpretation from the machines.  Although I could not understand half of the discussion, his research seemed quite interesting.  Dr. Davis is implementing statistical methods such as Bayesian inferencing and Dirichlet processes to isolate specifics actions into probabilities for the computer.  Specifically, he specified the advantages of using Dirichlet processes, where their probability distribution is a range of its own probability distributions.  These help vastly in making decisions and hypotheses with the computer.  While I felt as though I learned a fair bit, I understand I have most likely just scratched the surface of the research’s true meaning and applications.  And even though I am glad to have interviewed him, my dialogue with Dr. Davis confirmed I do not want to pursue research in the future.

Joseph Adams, Alex Cetnar, and Dr. James Davis bestowed their accumulated knowledge to me through this interview project.  Joe showed me how to succeed both in college and once I move into the “real world.”  Alex gave me more methods to succeed and get involved in college organizations.  Finally, Dr. Davis showed me how research was done in the CSE field and confirmed my previous contention of not wanting to pursue research.  While some may see the appeal of discovering new method and applications for existing computer infrastructure, I know there is little money in that area, and I feel it is not a self-rewarding idea to seek.  This project has confirmed many ideas I previously had about academic success and research, but it has also granted me new ones to ponder over.  Combining everything I have gained from Dr. Davis with Joe’s information as a guide to academic success and Alex’s involvement as a role model, my success at The Ohio State University is practically guaranteed.

Works Cited

Barker, J. W., and J. W. Davis. “Temporally-Dependent Dirichlet Process Mixtures for Egocentric Video Segmentation”. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. SCOPUS. Web. 23 Oct. 2016.

Zamalieva, D., A. Yilmaz, and J. W. Davis. A Multi-Transformational Model for Background Subtraction with Moving Cameras. Vol. 8689 LNCS., 2014. SCOPUS. 23 Oct. 2016 <www.scopus.com>.

Artifacts

[Artifacts are the items you consider to be representative of your academic interests and achievements. For each entry, include both an artifact and a detailed annotation.  An annotation is a reflective description of the artifact that attempts to communicate its significance.  For more information, go to: http://honors-scholars.osu.edu/e-portfolio. Delete these instructions and add your own post.]

About Me


My name is Joseph Rice, a new freshman at the Ohio State University.  Although I come from out-of-state in Parsippany, New Jersey, I am proud to call Columbus my new home.  The future of my academic career lies here over the next four years.  So while I look to the future, allow me to give a retrospective of my previous achievements and hurdles.

My career in academia began at St. Peters’ School, starting in kindergarten and ending at 4th grade.  Normally, students would continue from K-8th grade at St. Peters’ School, but I had to abruptly leave before attending 5th grade (at Northvail Elementary).  This was probably one of the toughest academic and social struggles for me.  Until that point, I had a relatively easy life; I was friends with my entire grade, I aced all the exams, and I was the star of my sports teams.  However, once I departed from St. Peters’, I got glasses, my soccer team disbanded, and I failed my first test.  Needless to say, my confidence took a devastating blow.

After enduring for a year, I reached middle school.  I was able to coast along with straight A’s through 6th grade.  Once I hit 7th grade, I made a mistake and held off on doing a project until precisely one night before it was due.  Entitled, “The Iceman,” I put off this history project until 9 PM.  That night, I pulled off my first all-nighter, and I thought I had learned my lesson to never again attempt something similar.  Unfortunately, similar late night schemes ensued and I was caught up in last minute projects.

Finally, I moved away from my middle school friends to go to a vocational school that pulled students from around the county.  My decision was primarily because that school allowed me to follow a passion for computers.  I opted out of an elective class for four years of computer classes with related curriculum.  I learned a variety of skills such as basic programming, network infrastructure, and network cable creation.  Aside from these special classes over four years, I performed well in high school with grades varying from B’s to A’s.  Overall, I am highly satisfied with my decision to attend the Morris County School of Technology for high school instead of a typical public high school.

I will continue to update this page with pertinent information about my college endeavors.

——

As a STEM EE Scholar, I have had the privilege to attend many events focused on the fields to science, technology, engineering, and/or math. However, my fondest experience of an event was the de-stress canvas painting event. Previous to this event, I found myself buried under homework, focusing on my studies, and test anxiety. While painting, I realized sometimes you work doesn’t meet your expectation. To combat this, I have to persevere and put more effort in so I can reach the final goal. Furthermore, when I encounter seemingly insurmountable adversity and fail, I try to remember the words of the late Bob Ross who said, “We don’t make mistakes, just happy little accidents.” These words have helped me calm down as I approach finals.

Recently, America and The Ohio State University have faced a most difficult choice between the lesser of two evils – presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. While he lost the popular vote, Donald J. Trump won the electoral vote 290-232. Recently riots and protests have been brought about by Hillary supporters who are angered she won the popular vote, but lost the election.