Looking back, it’s incredibly weird for me to even consider that there was a time where I’d decided that I didn’t like physics. Even just a year ago, I likely never would even have considered attending a physics seminar of any type, much less one helmed by former United States Secretary of Energy and Nobel laureate Steven Chu.
But- as the saying goes- times change and people change, and that’s how I found myself in the middle of the 2019 edition of the annual Alpheus Smith Lecture, where Steven Chu was presenting on the issue of climate change in our world today.
In all honesty, it was quite the experience. Sitting in this lecture hall full of people who weren’t required to, but rather, wanted to come to a physics seminar on climate change, I was gladly reminded that there are lots of other people out there who are, indeed, actually interested in the same things I am. The fact that I had come with friends only added to the sentiment, and despite it seeming that there were more grad students and professionals in the crowd than undergrads, I didn’t feel out of place whatsoever.
Though the content wasn’t quite like what I was hoping it would be, I still found it interesting nonetheless. Glancing at the notes I took during the lecture, I’m surprised at the sheer number of topics covered in such a short amount of time. Dr. Chu spoke about everything from the concentrations of Carbon 12 and Carbon 14 in the atmosphere to the Impossible Burger to the effects of air pollution on human health, and I can easily say that I learned something interesting about each topic he mentioned. Admittedly, I wasn’t able to understand everything- I simply do not have near the amount of experience or knowledge about these topics that the average attendee did- but that didn’t discourage me from listening to what he was saying and trying to use critical thinking to figure it out.
One of the biggest questions to consider, however, is whether this presentation fit my expectations of what research is like in the field of physics. To that, I would have to say both yes and no: there are most certainly elements of physics involved in climate change; however, from what I could tell from the presentation given, the issue is mostly chemistry-based. As such, I was mildly surprised that climate change was the chosen topic for this year’s lecture.
This lecture was actually the second academic seminar I’ve attended this year, and I have to say, I very much enjoy them. There is so much to learn from such great minds in such a short amount of time, and even if I don’t necessarily understand everything the presenter is describing, I find the topic exposure and networking possibilities invaluable. That being said, I most definitely plan to attend more seminars like both of the ones I’ve been to already- they’re a welcome, yet still intellectually stimulating break from the rigor of daily classes, and I’m excited to see what topics I’ll learn about from them in the future.