With all of the testing completed and everything decided on, our final code and design are as follows:
Design:
Code:
reverse(4);
celerate(4,0,27,3);
motorSpeed(4,27);
goToAbsolutePosition(137);
brake(4);
reverse(4);
motorSpeed(4,49);
goFor(1);
brake(4);
goFor(7.5);
reverse(4);
motorSpeed(4,25);
goToRelativePosition(50);
brake(4);
goFor(11);
reverse(4);
motorSpeed(4,52);
goToRelativePosition(-105);
brake(4);
goFor(1);
reverse(4);
motorSpeed(4,54);
goFor(1);
brake(4);
goFor(7.5);
reverse(4);
motorSpeed(4,55);
goToRelativePosition(-40);
brake(4);
goFor(3);
reverse(4);
motorSpeed(4,54);
goFor(1);
brake(4);
Our final performance test on the track produced the results as follows:
Our total cost from this final performance test was calculated as follows (only looking at Run 2 for each section):