When Xi speaks, official jump

Source: NYT (3/16/18)
When Xi Speaks, Chinese Officials Jump. Maybe Too High
By CHRIS BUCKLEY and KEITH BRADSHER

President Xi Jinping at a session of China’s legislature in Beijing on Thursday. The end of a limit on his tenure could undermine the second-guessing that prevents policy missteps. CreditWu Hong/EPA, via Shutterstock

BEIJING — After China’s president, Xi Jinping, ordered Beijing to cut its population, his protégé ordered the bulldozing of the homes of tens of thousands of migrants. After Mr. Xi told northern Chinese provinces to cut smog, cadres junked home heaters and stoves, leaving residents shivering.

These days when Mr. Xi speaks, officials from the top of the Communist Party to the lowest village committees snap to unflinching attention. The pressure on them may grow now that Mr. Xi has swept away a constitutional term limit on his presidency, strengthening his grip over the country.

But as these recent cases suggest, Mr. Xi’s daunting power may undercut effective policy or provoke public ire when lower officials scramble over each other to meet or exceed expectations, often leading to overreach and disarray.

“Whenever China has large-scale, top-down campaigns or initiatives, there are problems with overzealous officials and over-compliance,” said Elizabeth Economy, an expert on Chinese domestic and foreign policy at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York who has written a book on policy under Mr. Xi.

“China under Xi Jinping will be particularly prone to this challenge,” she said. “He operates almost entirely in a top-down manner, and his emphasis on control means that feedback mechanisms — in terms of signals from both the market and civil society — don’t function well.”

Mr. Xi meeting delegates at the National People’s Congress. Top-down campaigns in China always present “problems with overzealous officials and over-compliance,” one expert said. Video by CGTN

Many Chinese people have welcomed Mr. Xi’s brusque, commanding way after what they saw as the listless rule of his predecessor, Hu Jintao. “Orders don’t make it out of Zhongnanhai” — the party headquarters in Beijing — became a common lament under Mr. Hu, who handed the reins to Mr. Xi in 2012.

Since then, Mr. Xi has cast himself as a decisive, unwavering leader with a long-term plan to make China a prosperous and respected great power. On Sunday, the legislature, the National People’s Congress, passed a constitutional amendment erasing a limit of two presidential terms and setting Mr. Xi on course to run China for at least another decade.

Mr. Xi began his second five-year term as president after a unanimous vote by legislators on Saturday. Officials have said that extending Mr. Xi’s time in office beyond this term will assure stable policies for decades. The swift, secretive way in which Mr. Xi secured his extended reign let officials know that Mr. Xi would bulldoze past any resistance to get his way.

“Xi effectively is signaling to opponents of his policy agenda that they cannot wait him out and that they need to get on board with his agenda,” said Ryan Hass, a former director for China at the National Security Council who is now a fellow at the Brookings Institution. “He wouldn’t take this step, and expose himself to such risk, unless he felt it was needed to bust through opposition to his agenda.”

The National People’s Congress voting to lift the two-term limit on the presidency. Mr. Xi appears to have pursued the change in order to convince opponents that they could not simply wait him out. Video by CGTN

Mr. Xi has already established sweeping authority, through his anticorruption drive, and by creating a plethora of new powers and leadership groups that channel decisions to him. His overhaul of the military also demonstrated a willingness to take on entrenched bureaucracies.

A reorganization of ministries and agencies revealed at the congress on Tuesday may let Mr. Xi and other leaders better steer bureaucracies. And a new government lineup, to be announced on Monday, is likely to put Mr. Xi’s close allies atop his administration, making it easier to communicate and refine orders. One such ally, Wang Qishan, became vice president on Saturday.

But Mr. Xi’s centralization of power over the sprawling bureaucracy can also create confusion and overshooting.

A district in southern Beijing after the homes of tens of thousands of migrants were bulldozed. The demolition was meant to advance a government order to reduce the city’s population. CreditBryan Denton for The New York Times

Officials are often reluctant to risk making decisions that draw suspicion of corruption or political disloyalty, a Beijing think tank said last year. But when ordered to act, cadres are often eager to avoid suspicion of sloth. The outcome, several experts said, can be a confounding mix of overreaction to orders and reluctance to act on one’s own initiative.

“Things are shot out of the top of the party, and they’re unworkable when they’re implemented,” said James McGregor, the chairman of greater China for APCO Worldwide, who advises companies dealing with Chinese officialdom. “It’s very hard to get an official to make decisions these days, because they’re all scared of doing the wrong thing.”

China’s top-down system has long been prone to overshooting. But several factors may magnify such problems in Mr. Xi’s next term.

In recent years, he has installed officials loyal to him across most provinces and ministries, and ardent supporters have sworn unquestioning obedience. Their awed obedience can encourage rigid enforcement of even vague or conflicting policies. Officials rarely suffer serious punishment for over-eagerly imposing Mr. Xi’s orders.

“Unless loyalty is absolute, it is absolute disloyalty,” Li Hongzhong, one of the avid loyalists promoted by Mr. Xi into the party’s top ranks, said in 2016.

Mr. Xi’s efforts to break down walls between the party and government bureaucracies may discourage midlevel technocrats from improving policies. And Mr. Xi’s crackdown on rights lawyers, rights advocates, independent-minded journalists and online debate has silenced many voices who could question misguided government decisions.

Nobody sees such overreach producing anything as calamitous as Mao’s Great Leap Forward and subsequent famine. But Sun Liping, a well-known sociologist at Tsinghua University in Beijing, has warned against a mobilized bureaucracy stoking excessive zeal among subordinates.

“This mobilizing form of government sometimes evolves into a race between officials. ‘If you’re tough, then I’ll be even tougher. If you go to extremes, I’ll go further,’” Professor Sun wrote about recent cases of official overreach in an essay that spread on China’s internet last month before being censored.

“Everything in one fell blow, thunderous bombast, magnified down layer after layer, and then after the task is completed, just chicken feathers everywhere,” Professor Sun wrote, using a slang phrase for scant accomplishments.

Late last summer, to cut coal use in northern China and replace it with cleaner natural gas, officials tore out coal stoves and suspended coal deliveries. But when cold weather arrived, natural gas supplies fell short because planned pipelines had not all been finished.

Mr. Xi had ordered Beijing to reduce its population at least as early as 2014. But the effort progressed fitfully until last year, when Mr. Xi’s protégé, Cai Qi, apparently eager to make his mark as the new party chief in Beijing, seized on a deadly apartment building fire to push mass demolitions. Tens of thousands ended up scrambling for shelter after losing their homes.

Officials are also racing to turn Mr. Xi’s biggest visions into reality, including Xiong’an New Area, the new model city planned for a stretch of land 80 miles south of Beijing. Mr. Xi began vocally promoting the idea about a year ago.

Not all of Mr. Xi’s policies appear prone to waves of excess zeal. Since destabilizing policy gyrations in 2015, financial policy has settled down, said Barry Naughton, a professor at the University of California, San Diego, who studies Chinese economic policymaking. But if China’s economy hits a rough patch, presenting difficult choices between shoring up growth and reining in debt, that stability may not last.

“It seems to me that bandwagoning, sycophancy, toadying are all becoming much more fundamental,” Professor Naughton said. “That’s got to change the way the system functions as a whole.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *