Testing Logs

Date: 02/17/2023

Number of Times Tested: 10

Test Duration: 2 hours

Who ran the test: Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

Who was present:  Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

What was being tested: line following using photosensors, shaft encoders

Observations:

  • The robot followed the line when going through the track in reverse, but not the normal way.

Outcomes: 

  • We got it to follow the line successfully but we needed many trial runs.

 

Date: 03/01/2023

Number of Times Tested: 15-20 

Test Duration: 2 hours 30 mins

Who ran the test: Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

Who was present:  Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

What was being tested: Performance checkpoint 1

Observations:

  • Hard coding involves a lot of trial runs. We may run into problems because of the changing physical conditions. It is still the simplest way to navigate the robot

Outcomes: 

  • We successfully made the robot go through the path that was required for performance checkpoint 1.

 

Date: 03/08/2023

Number of Times Tested: 10-15 

Test Duration: 3 hours

Who ran the test: Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

Who was present:  Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

What was being tested: Performance checkpoint 2

Observations:

  • Getting aligned with the light for the boarding pass is difficult. Hitting the right button was a fifty-fifty chance if it did not read anything, as the blue button was set as the default.

Outcomes: 

  • We successfully made the robot read the light and hit the right button for the boarding pass.

 

Date: 03/22/2023

Number of Times Tested: 10-15 

Test Duration: 3 hours

Who ran the test: Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

Who was present:  Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

What was being tested: Performance checkpoint 3

Observations:

  • The robot had some trouble with flipping the lever back up. This was because our turns were very fast which made it a little inconsistent.

Outcomes: 

  • We successfully made the robot flip the lever down, wait for five seconds, and flip it back up.

 

Date: 03/29/2023

Number of Times Tested: 10-15 

Test Duration: 3 hours

Who ran the test: Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

Who was present:  Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

What was being tested: Performance checkpoint 4

Observations:

  • Our robot always dragged across the wall, which actually made it consistently align itself with the passport lever.

Outcomes: 

  • We successfully made the robot flip the lever down, wait for five seconds, and flip it back up.

 

Date: 04/05/2023

Number of Times Tested: 10-15 

Test Duration: 3 hours

Who ran the test: Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

Who was present:  Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

What was being tested: Performance checkpoint 5

Observations:

  • We went with a very simple approach to the luggage drop-off. We had the luggage sitting on top of our QR code holder, the robot just rammed into the drop-off location, which made the luggage fall into it.

Outcomes: 

  • The design worked consistently, and we successfully completed performance checkpoint 4.

 

Date: 04/12/2023

Number of Times Tested: 10-15 

Test Duration: 3 hours

Who ran the test: Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

Who was present:  Jeevan, Tory, Aidan, Aadi

What was being tested: Performance test 1

Observations:

  • Our robot was very inconsistent and we struggled to get a perfect run. We were not able to get our robot to read the light for the boarding pass, as its positioning was always different after completing the passport task.

Outcomes: 

  • After rigorous testing, and refinements to the code, we got it to complete all the tasks for performance test 1.