About the Lab:
The group was tasked with creating and testing multiple code solutions using the chosen AEV design. The group chose the AEV Shell design over the AEV Basket design due to potential ability to optimize energy. The group designed multiple codes testing three different methods of approach to the mission tasks. The group designed a code to output a lower continuous speed over a longer length of the track. The group designed another code to output a high initial burst of speed allowing the AEV to coast along the track. The group designed a third code to output three bursts of speed along the track as to still be able to coast to the end, while maintaining more control over when the final coasting would take place. These codes were tested for energy consumption, consistency between runs, ability to react to changes, and potential flexibility when placed on other tracks. The group followed the lab safety procedures and was sure to not allow the AEV to fall from the track.
Take-Aways:
The group determined that the first method of low power for an extended length of track was inefficient and unable to operate within the design criteria the group had put forth. The group determined that the second method of a high initial burst of speed was efficient, but operationally inconsistent and therefore unable to fit the design criteria as well. The group determined that the third method of three bursts of speed allowed for control over the operationally consistency while providing a decent compromise in terms of energy consumption. Although the group was unable to perform more tests with the third method, the group has taken away that the third option is the group’s best option in moving forward with the project.
Schedule/Team-Meeting Notes:
The team agreed to meet in Hitchcock’s First Year computer lab on 4/1/17. John completed the looking backwards section as well as worked on various other parts of the report the day prior. The group worked together to complete any other remaining parts of the report online.
Cross Comparison of Tested Code:
