Available and potential needed services for children (trauma from parental substance misuse)

A large portion of families receiving child welfare services are coping with parental substance misuse. The following conclusions have been retrieved from a publication by childwelfare.gov. A 2009 study showed that about 12% of children in the United States live with a parent who is dependent on or misuses alcohol or other drugs. About 10% of births occur with the infant having been exposed to substances prenatally which can have severe long-term impacts on the child.

“Maternal drug and alcohol use during pregnancy have been associated with premature birth, low birth weight, slowed growth, and a variety of physical, emotional, behavioral, and cognitive problems (AIA, 2012; National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA], 2011).”

There are unique challenges child welfare agencies face when addressing parental substance use disorders. Some obstacles include insufficient service availability to meet existing needs, inadequate funds for services or lack of client insurance coverage, difficulties engaging parents in treatment, knowledge gaps among child welfare workers, and lack of coordination between child welfare systems and other healthcare services.

Innovative approaches and treatments do exist, including early identification of at-risk families in treatment programs, shared family care programs that connect families with a host family mentor, family peer mentors, family treatment drug courts, gender-sensitive treatment, and family-centered treatment services that involve the whole family. There are also numerous grant programs funded by The Children’s Bureau to support children and families, such as the Regional Partnership Grants.

Individualized treatment and case plans are crucial to a person or family’s recovery. Collaborative strategies with health professionals, mentors, and specialists have proven to be most successful in achieving long-term and permanent success.

Outdoor Activity Balances Leniency and Neglect

Outdoor activity is essential to the mental and physical development of children, but children may not get enough outdoor playtime if parents fear their decision to let their children play outside alone will be reported as neglect. Unfortunately, due to a lack of resources, some parents must choose between letting their children play outside alone or not at all.

Child Protective Services cannot always distinguish between neglect and more lenient parenting practices. The systems in place to protect children from neglect can sometimes have adverse effects, especially in vulnerable communities that are more strictly monitored by authorities.

False reports of neglect are harmful to the accused families and distract from actual cases of child maltreatment. A report called Rethinking the Parenting Paradigm includes a health assessment of child protection policies in Montgomery County, Maryland from 2015. The results showed that:

  • Fear of being reported to child protective services is one reason why parents limit outdoor freedom.
  • There is a higher risk of being reported for neglect than of actually being found neglectful.
  • Certain vulnerable populations are at higher risk of being reported and investigated, while not necessarily having a higher likelihood of neglecting their children or of leaving them unsupervised.

The amount of time that children spend playing outdoors has significantly decreased over the years, and that time has a direct impact on long-term health. The average American child spends as little as 30 minutes of unstructured outdoor play a day and spending half as much time outdoors as they did 20 years ago. The lack of outdoor play is connected to long-term health issues such as obesity, anxiety, depression, and other developmental concerns.

Public debate on acceptable styles of parenting is polarized, and spans between two extreme styles of parenting: “helicopter” and “free range.” While responsible parenting allows for a wide range of behaviors, parents that exercise “free range” are more at risk of getting involved in child welfare systems.

The Ohio Children’s Trust Fund defines neglect in broad terms: not providing a child with food, shelter, medical care, education, supervision or clothes. But without laws that distinguish between neglect and “free range parenting”, child protective services may unintentionally harm the children it seeks to protect.

This is an area that CPS should continue to refine to provide the most valuable care to those who need it most.

Purdue Pharma Offers Reparations for Individuals Affected by Opioid Crisis

The aggressive marketing and pharmaceutical sales of opioids in the past decade have left a devastating wake of addiction and death in the United States. Now, individuals who have been harmed by prescription opioids have the chance to file claims against Purdue Pharma, the maker of the painkiller OxyContin. Until July 30 of this year, people who have suffered from the effects of prescription opioid use will have the opportunity to seek compensation.

As of June 11, 2020, about 17,800 personal-injury claims have been filed by people who believe they or their loved ones were harmed by these prescription opioids.

Purdue Pharma is widely believed to be the instigator of the opioid epidemic. In 2019, the company declared bankruptcy which brought the more than 2,000 lawsuits against the company to a halt. “Purdue Pharma and its owner, the Sackler family, reportedly set aside $10 billion or more and put the company into a public trust to pay individual victims’ claims,” according to Newsomelaw.com. The company launched a $23.8 million advertising campaign to announce its opportunity for individuals to file claims.

This bankruptcy is unusual in that the implications of this company’s actions have spurred a national health crisis that has taken hundreds of thousands of lives and created a case for reparations beyond what can be quantified. It cemented a systemic crisis that will take years to undo.

It was also complicated by the sordid actions of the Sackler family, Purdue Pharma’s owners, who had transferred about $1 billion to foreign locations prior to filing bankruptcy. The case which involves Purdue Pharma filing for bankruptcy, also proposes a settlement worth more than $10 billion over time, plus $3 billion from the Sackler family over the next seven years, and an additional $1.5 billion from the sale of the family’s global pharmaceutical business, Mundipharma. It would also require that the family give up ownership of Purdue Pharma.

If you or a loved one has been harmed by the effects of opioids sold by Purdue Pharma, you can access a list of instructions on how to file a claim here.

Hotline Calls Spike During Stay-at-Home Orders

In a time of stay-at-home orders, heightened financial stress, and a lack of in-person resources that usually exist, incidents of child maltreatment and domestic abuse are increasing while reported cases are falling. Children are not receiving access to educators, who are often the front-line defense in keeping children safe. Child welfare workers are scrambling to ensure that children continue to receive the care they need despite the desperate circumstances.

An article by USA Today reported that educators including teachers, administrators, and counselors report about one in every five claims of child mistreatment. With children sequestered to their homes and limitations placed on who can visit them, reporting a case of mistreatment is becoming a task that is more precarious than ever. While child caseworkers are limiting visits to their clients’ homes for fear of spreading the virus, they will not become absent from these children’s lives.

Welfare officials are adapting to the virtual environment and setting up video calls to do walkthroughs of children’s home environments. They are also arranging in person visits with higher risk cases, or children who may be in immediate danger. These cases may be addressed through visits in the child’s backyard.

Parents are also facing heightened stress as they learn to manage 24/7 childcare, whether they are working remotely and/or are required to go into the office as essential workers. According to USA Today, “Calls to the group’s National Parent Helpline for families in crisis have spiked 30% in the past week, Pion-Berlin said. They’re coming from mothers and fathers stressed about child care, food insecurity and other fears arising from the coronavirus crisis.”

The Columbus Police Department has also seen an “alarming increase” of domestic violence calls since the stay-at-home order has been in place.

If you are dealing with a difficult home environment, you are not alone. Here are some resources that are available and ready to help during this time of crisis:

Franklin County Children Services Child Abuse Hotline: 614-229-7000

Ohio Domestic Violence Network

CAP4KIDS

National Child Abuse Hotline: 800-422-4453

Generation O: Trapped in a Cycle of Addiction

In 2019, a New York Times reporter, Dan Levin, detailed the horrific experiences of children in Ohio who were removed from their homes after years of neglect, abuse and traumatic childhood experiences. He leads the story by writing that, “Nearly 27,000 children in Ohio were removed from their homes last year, many because of the opioid crisis. More than a quarter were placed in the care of relatives.”

The stories Levin recounted were those of children sent outside without sufficient food and water while their parents use drugs, as sister and brother Hannah and James experienced each summer. These children were also exposed to traumatic violence between their parents, as seven-year-old Hannah called 911 after her mother chased her father with a knife. Hannah’s father was later killed by her mother’s boyfriend.

Stories like these paint the picture of the lives of many of these 27,000 children. Parents in rehab, sick or dead from drug addiction are circumstances that young children are exposed to far too commonly. So commonly, that a name was dedicated to children trapped in these vicious cycles of addiction – Generation O.

Certain geographic areas are more dense with these concerns.

“In Portsmouth, Ohio, at least a quarter of the school district’s nearly 650 junior high and high school students have a close relative who uses drugs.”

As written in another NYT article by Dan Levin, this will have a long-lasting impact on the communities with heavy users, as more children are being born with a dependency on opioids, and many with severe learning disabilities and other types of disabilities. This poses a new challenge for educators as schools increasingly become places of refuge in the lives of maltreated children.

“Many students frequently come to school wearing the same, unwashed clothes days in a row, so shelves are stocked with clean garments, along with fresh shampoo, bars of soap and deodorant.

Yet some of the teenagers change back into their own clothes after the final bell rings and the last class ends, ‘because parents will take new clothes and sell them for drug money,’ said Drew Applegate, an assistant principal.”

In a sobering reality of family life in Portsmouth, an art teacher cannot think of any student who paints a two-parent family during their family portrait lesson.

As long as the opioid crisis presides over these communities, there will continue to be a shift that emphasizes the role of educators in children’s lives.

Medication Assisted Treatments in Prison and Jail Populations

Medication Assisted Treatments (MATs) are a central component of Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) treatment, and are especially vital to the prison and jail populations who struggle with addiction at a disproportionately higher rate than the general population, according to a study called Effectiveness of medication assisted treatment for opioid use in prison and jail settings: a meta-analysis and systematic review. by The Department of Health and Human Services.

“Correctional Facilities showed that 23% of state prisoners and 18% of federal prisoners report lifetime use of heroin and other opioids,” the study wrote.

Because people are forced to remain sober throughout their time in correctional facilities, their tolerance levels often increase and they are therefore more likely to overdose when they are released.

“Within two weeks of being released, former inmates overdose at rates nearly 130 times as high as the general population,” according to an article by Stat News.

Because of this, it is especially important that treatment is administered prior to their release.

MATs, in this study, is a term used in reference to methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone – three drugs used to counteract the effects of opioids. Methadone is one of the most widely used forms of opioid addiction treatment, and it is a full opioid agonist which reduces the symptoms of opioid withdrawal and increases treatment retention. Buprenorphine is a partial agonist which is effective in reducing illicit opioid use and addresses opioid withdrawal and cravings, similarly to methadone. Naltrexone is an antagonist that has not been thoroughly researched or approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but studies show that it also increases treatment retention and reduces illicit opioid use.

Despite the positive effects that MATs can have on a person’s battle with addiction, these treatments are rarely used in correctional facilities, depriving inmates of the opportunity to rehabilitate while incarcerated.

This study investigated the effects of MAT treatment during incarceration on inmate substance use and treatment initiation post-incarceration. Results showed that participants who used any of the aforementioned treatment drugs throughout incarceration were more likely to engage in community-based substance use treatments post-release, as compared to those who solely used methadone for detox purposes.

“Pooled effects from the meta-analysis suggest that inmates who received methadone during incarceration were more than 8 times as likely to engage in community-based substance use treatment compared to those who did not receive methadone during incarceration, and there was consistent support for engagement in treatment across observational studies.”

Studies examining the effects of buprenorphine and naltrexone found similar results. Participants on buprenorphine were more likely to engage in treatment post-incarceration compared to participants receiving methadone. Additionally, individuals with a naltrexone implant were more likely to participate in treatment six months post-release compared to a control group receiving methadone.

This is a method proven to be effective in reducing illicit opioid usage, and working to incorporate it into prison systems should be a leading priority for criminal justice officials.

Moore, K. E., Roberts, W., Reid, H. H., Smith, K. M. Z., Oberleitner, L. M. S., & McKee, S. A. (2019). Effectiveness of medication assisted treatment for opioid use in prison and jail settings: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 99, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2018.12.003

Stress and Isolation Can Impact Substance Use

People who have a history or are currently dealing with addiction are especially vulnerable to relapse when faced with isolation, and this is especially worrisome given the intensity and duration of isolation associated with the COVID-19 crisis. With restrictions on travel and unusually stressful economic and social changes, people across the world are forced to find ways to pass time and to cope with stress. Substance use can be a maladaptive coping strategy that many people may fall back on during these difficult times.

A Forbes article noted that the sales of spirits spiked about 50% the week of March 21, a week when the onset of the pandemic began to overwhelm the United States.

“Nationally, tequila saw the biggest spike, up more than 75%, underscoring its status as the fastest growing spirits segment in the U.S,” said Forbes contributor, Joseph V Micallef. “It was followed closely by gin. Wine sales were up 66% and beer sales, in a reversal of the usual recession consumption pattern, lagged even though they still rose 42%.”

A study was conducted by the Pacific Neuroscience Institute (PNI) on the effects of stress and isolation on relapse. The results indicated that the effects of people who struggle with drug or alcohol use are at increased risk of relapse in isolation. “Preclinical studies show that animals kept in isolation are more likely to press a lever to receive a dose of drug or alcohol than animals able to interaction with other animals.”

The connection between isolation and an increased need for stress-relieving rewards is proven to be a chemical reaction. The PNI recommends that those who are struggling seek out regular social interactions with sober family members, friends or other people who can offer support. There are online platforms set-up to support individuals who are struggling and cannot receive in-person help during the pandemic.

AA and SMART Recovery are two recovery platforms that have online services including specialized group forums, peer support groups, meetings, and other events designed to create remote support systems for individuals in need.

Doctors and mental health specialists are also accessible throughout this time and available to ensure that everyone has the resources they need during this global health crisis. Personal health is of the utmost priority during this time and is something we could all focus more time on.

Reach out to any people or organizations who can help you get through this difficult time, and don’t forget to make your support available to others as well. We’ll all get through this together.

Child Welfare Stimulus Plan

As the coronavirus epidemic continues to affect the country, parents and children involved in the child welfare system face unprecedented challenges. These challenges include restricted visitations, lack of access to social and behavioral health services, and added stress for children who will age out of the system during a time of nationwide isolation.

The CARES Act, a $2 trillion stimulus plan for the American economy passed by Congress, will provide modest additional support to programs at the Administration for Children and Families, a division within the Department of Health and Human Services. The Chronicle of Social Change reports this support includes:

  • $45 million for Child Welfare Services, about a 15% increase to the 2020 allocation for this program.
  • $45 million for the Family Violence Prevention and Services program to help shelters and the National Domestic Violence Hotline, a 25% increase to the 2020 allocation.
  • $25 million for immediate assistance to help programs in the Runaway and Homeless Youth Program.

While the additional funding will assist children and families so that their basic food and housing needs are met, child welfare advocates are requesting far more funding than what has already been allocated according to a separate report in The Chronicle of Social Change. Specifically, the Child Welfare and Mental Health Coalition is asking for more than $3 billion in the next stimulus. Their request includes:

  • $1 billion for Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention, to support maltreatment prevention efforts including abuse and neglect hotlines, home visiting programs, and family resource centers.
  • $1 billion is being requested for Promoting Safe and Stable Families, a part of the Title IV-B program that supports family preservation, reunification and supports for adoptive and guardianship parents.
  • $500 million for the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to mitigate disruptions in the system that will likely occur as social distancing measures continue to exist.
  • $500 million increase the Chafee Independent Living Program to offer rapid transitional housing for current and former foster youth.
  • Additional funding to raise the reimbursement in foster care prevention in the Family First Prevention Services Act from 50 percent to the state-by-state Federal Medical Assistance Percentage rate, which may remain at 50% or increase to above 70% for states with the lowest per-capita incomes.

Stay up to date with changes in child welfare funding throughout the COVID-19 outbreak on The Chronicle of Social Change website.

COVID-19 is Especially Tough on Kids in Need

Children in foster care are highly at risk

Published on 4/21/20

Peer Recovery Supporters: Benefits and Best Practices

The approach to treating substance use disorder (SUD) has been changing to be more recovery-oriented. There is a shift from treatment and control of symptoms to treatment focused on approaches that empower the client to maintain long-term recovery.  Peer recovery supporters (PRS), trained individuals with their own recovery experience, are thought to provide significant advocacy and support for individuals struggling with addiction. PRS support and advocate for their clients as they navigate the successes and setbacks of the recovery process.

Some of the advantages of using PRS are that clients paired with PRS:

  • Formed better relationships with their treatment providers and greater utilization of social supports
  • Stayed in treatment longer and reported higher satisfaction with treatment
  • Had reduced substance use and were less likely to relapse

Peer Recovery Supporters, in turn, express that having the opportunity to share their lived experience with addiction and recovery with others helps them to:

  • gain better insight into their own symptoms
  • increase social engagement and
  • improve their sense of life satisfaction

The use of PRS as a component of a recovery-oriented treatment model is showing promise for promoting long-term recovery. It is expected that the use of PRS in SUD recovery will continue to grow, and agencies may need to make additional adjustments to support PRS. Cultivating agency culture to embrace and promote the inclusion of peers in SUD treatment is vital to having a successful PRS program. Further, agencies should consider the expansion of peer occupational growth opportunities as well as professional development efforts that allow PRS to qualify for advanced positions. Considering the PRS as a valued professional member of the SUD treatment team will help maximize their ability to help clients engage in treatment and work toward long-term sobriety.

References:
Eddie, D., Hoffman, L., Vilsaint, C., Abry, A., Bergman, B., Hoeppner, B., … Kelly, J. F. (2019). Lived experience in new models of care for substance use disorder: A systematic review of peer recovery support services and recovery coaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JUN), 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052
Ahmed, A. O., Hunter, K. M., Mabe, A. P., Tucker, S. J., & Buckley, P. F. (2015). The Professional Experiences of Peer Specialists in the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network. Community Mental Health Journal, 51(4), 424–436. doi:10.1007/s10597-015-9854-8
Chapman, S. A., Blash, L. K., Mayer, K., & Spetz, J. (2018). Emerging Roles for Peer Providers in Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 54(6S3), S267–S274. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.02.019