Group F
ENGR 1182
Dr. Busick
5 February 2018
Website Deliverables 3
Michael’s Design
Figure 1: Michael’s Concept Design
Michael:
In my design I aimed for maximum efficiency with minimal size. I was able to use small pieces to build the design in an attempt to decrease they weight, which will ideally lower power usage and drag. I also was able to build aesthetic design into the concept. In order to maintain the 2in rule from the Arduino to the magnet by lifting it off at an angle from the back wings. I was also able to balance the design so it will balance well while on the track. As well as maximizing stability with smart placement of bolts and connecting pieces.
Jack’s Design
Figure 2: Jack’s Concept Design
Jack:
My design uses only one piece of plastic as a frame. It uses less bolts and material making it stronger and less costly. Features a symmetric design with propellers facing the same direction, making it balanced and safe. Cons to my design are: its weight, shape and size.
Ryan’s Design
Figure 3: Ryan’s Concept Design
Ryan:
This AEV improves on the sample design by improving efficiency with a front cone that slices through the air when it is moving forward. It also contains two trapezoidal pieces at the rear of the vehicle that are tilted at approximately a 135° angle clockwise away from the main chassis of the vehicle. The front cone has a diameter of 1″ at the top and flattens out on the bottom.
Bob’s Design
Figure 4: Bob’s Concept Design
Bob:
This design was intended for a more luxurious and smooth ride for passengers. The extra weight of the AEV directly in-between the motors allow for a greater perpendicular normal force stabilizing the AEV. Two motors facing in the same distraction give maximum torque when weighted down with cargo. Finally, the rectangular shape allows for easier modifications to the AEV and easier maintenance.