LAB 03: Design Concepts- Screening and Scoring

Description of lab 03 and important take-aways:

After the team evaluated the criteria (see Table 1 and Table 2), it was decided that prototypes 1 and 5 would be developed because the scores were both high enough to achieve the mission. Prototype 1 had a Concept Score of 3.3 and Prototype 5 had a Concept Score of 3.45.

 

This lab has given the team the ability to not have bias in their critique of the AEV prototype designs. The use of finding the right price, weight, amount of drag, balance, and energy consumption is very important in finding the right design which the scoring sheet pointed out. Prototypes 1 and 5 scored the most efficiently and will be looked out as the main designs for the upcoming testing periods.

 

Table 1. Concept Screening

Success Criteria Reference Prototype 2 Prototype 3 Prototype 4 Prototype 5
Weight + + 0
Price + +
Air drag 0 + 0
Balance 0 0 + 0
Energy Consumption 0 0 + +
Braking Power 0 + 0
Cost 0 + 0
Sum +’s 1 1 3 4 1
Sum 0’s 3 0 1 1 3
Sum –’s 2 3 2 2 2
Net Score -1 -2 1 2 -1
Continue? Combine No Yes Yes No

 

Table 2. Concept Scoring Matrix

A Reference Prototype 2 Prototype 3 Prototype 4 Prototype 5
Success Criteria Weight Rating Weighted Score Rating Weighted Score Rating Weighted Score Rating Weighted Score Rating Weighted Score
Weight 30% 3 0.9 4 1.2 3 0.9 2 0.6 4 1.2
Price 15% 5 0.75 1 0.15 3 0.45 1 0.15 3 0.45
Air Drag 15% 2 0.3 2 0.3 1 0.15 3 0.45 5 0.75
Balance 20% 3 0.6 2 0.4 1 0.2 3 0.6 3 0.6
Energy Consumption 5% 3 0.15 1 0.05 2 0.1 3 0.15 3 0.15
Braking Power 5% 2 0.1 1 0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1
Cost 10% 5 0.5 1 0.1 2 0.2 2 0.2 2 0.2
Total Score 3.3 2.25 2.2 2.3 3.45
Continue? Develop No No No Develop

 

Arduino Code

 

reverse(4);

celerate(4,0,25,3);

goFor(1);

motorSpeed(4,20);

goFor(2);

reverse(4);

motorSpeed(4,20);

goFor(2);

brake(4);

 

 

Capture

Capture