The wing orientation remained the same from the design chosen from the Advance R&D. Looking at the data from the aR&D and Performance Test 1, this design was shown to be consistently more efficient. The arm, battery, and Arduino board had to be adjusted since the arm was on the wrong side of the rail.
Sales Pitch Focus Areas:
Efficiency – based on the graphs, the design above is the most efficient; traveled furthest with same power requirement (Orange in graphs below)
Maintenance – more space to adjust and change the arm and Arduino board if needed
Cost – no additional parts needed
Stability – arm secured to base, weight distributed evenly