In recent years the fight over women’s right to abortion has been a hot topic. Texas passed a law that would allow civil citizens of the state of Texas to sue providers of abortions, either performing or inducing the procedure. To get around the women’s constitutional right to an abortion, Texas allows the provider to be prosecuted instead of the patient. Forcing physicians from performing or inducing abortions, stopping abortions from taking place in the state. This takes the blame from the state and allows anyone to sue a provider, for a minimum of $10,000 plus court and attorney fees. The bill also includes a clause that denies the defendant the right to use Roe v. Wade as a defense tactic. The bill gives all the power to the plaintiff including the location of the court and monetary benefits. A Texas citizen in Dallas can effectively sue a physician in Austin. Forcing the physician and his lawyer to come to court in Dallas rather than the county the abortion took place
This an example of Simone de Beauvoir’s “Othering” and Hegel’s Master and Slave Dialectic. Simone de Beauvoir explains “Thus it is that no group ever sets itself up as the One without at once setting up the Other…against itself.” (de Beauvoir, 1). For men to assert their authority, they must subjugate women to what they believe to be right. Where the One forces the Other to submit, this follows Hegel’s theory of the Master and Slave Dialectic. One must have control over the other, for the state to systematically maintain control over the Other they must assert their authority over them. In a time when women are becoming more prominent in business, society, and international stage. The One is working to maintain its control, thus refusing rights to women that were already established as their civil right by Roe v. Wade.
In 2019, the government implemented a new rule regarding Title X funding. Any organization within the Title X network who was receiving funding from the federal government was barred from mentioning abortion. Forcing clinics all around the country to withdraw from Title X which included most of their funding. Title X was passed during the Nixon administration that provided funding for family planning clinics. This includes contraceptives, STD testing, cancer screening and counseling for low-income communities (Gerson, 2021). Without the funding many clinics were forced to close their doors including two in Cincinnati because they refused to not give their patients information on abortion (Ellis, 2019).
As Supreme Court considers abortion cases, local governments impose bans (nbcnews.com)
Sources:
Astudillo, Carla, and Erin Douglas. “We Annotated Texas’ near-Total Abortion BAN. Here’s What the Law Says about Enforcement.” The Texas Tribune, The Texas Tribune, 10 Sept. 2021, www.texastribune.org/2021/09/10/texas-abortion-law-ban-enforcement/.
Ellis, Nicquel Terry. “’Teetering on a Public Health Crisis.’ New Title X Policy Forces Ohio Planned Parenthood Clinics to Close.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 20 Sept. 2019, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/09/20/new-title-x-policy-funding-forces-ohio-planned-parenthood-clinics-close/2345553001/.
Gerson, Jennifer. “What Is Title X, and What Did Trump and Biden Do to Change It?” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 8 Oct. 2021, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/10/08/title-x-how-trump-biden-changed-family-planning-program/6037924001/.