A challenge from the new director? No, not exactly. These words appeared in print exactly 100 years ago today in the Knox County Democratic Banner. The words were part of an article written by Kathryn Anderson explaining the process by which counties could secure their own “county agent.”
The article goes on to say that any county that desires an agent may receive an “appropriation of $1,590 from the federal and state governments, $1,200 going to the agent’s salary and $390 toward the maintenance of his own automobile.” A county contribution toward this work could come from commissioners, the local Farm Bureau association, and individual contributions.
Perhaps the most interesting part of the article was the section related to the role of the agent. According to the article, “he is not a man who comes to criticize existing methods and force his own ideas, but is rather a clearing house where all may bring their problems and work them out together.” While the gender specific language of the statement is a bit out of date, the idea is not.
Collaborative problem-solving is at the heart of the contemporary community engagement movement occurring in higher education. When we use an engaged approach, we recognize the value of indigenous knowledge that resides within a community and work with members of that community to co-create solutions.
Granted, there are still many situations where the diffusion of innovation or best practices is the central objective of our work. In these cases we recommend a preferred course of action based on what we know to be true through by way of science. This approach in often used when citizens are not even aware of the problems that could arise from their current practices. But even when dissemination of information or behavior change is the goal, it is important that we share knowledge with respect for our learners and the decisions they make regarding their lives and their livelihoods.
Yes, we want to keep up with the times. But I also believe that there are some enduring values like respectful engagement that transcend the past, present, and future.
Thanks to Bob Joseph, chair of the OARDC Advisory Committee for sharing the information from the Knox Democratic Banner.
The concept of engagement further places the university in the position of a learner and thus, we grow smarter and better over time.
The article reminds me of the mission of the Smith-Lever Act and the importance of a local agent’s presence to build (establish) a connection between the community and the land grant institution — to work together to find solutions for local problems and issues. For this collaboration to work, relationships must be built.
This reminds me how important it is to listen to what community members are saying and then respond appropriately. Sometimes this may mean asking questions before sharing resources. As we strive to be experts in our field let us remember to remain humble and listen.