Leopard Skins and Prints: The Good and the Bad

 

Thoughts on Leopard skins and prints have been wide-spread since the early 20th century. It has either been a highly valued, luxurious and sophisticated item among the upper class or a symbol of animal magnetism. It has been worn by president’s wives, royalty, and even rock stars.

Leopard skin coats and other clothing and accessory items became especially popular in the 1920s after movie stars like Joan Crawford strutted through Hollywood movies in the skin. One fashion designer of the time, Christian Dior, kept the trend going for the more sophisticated woman. He was quoted, “If you are fair and sweet, don’t wear it.”

When the 1970s and 80s rolled around, leopard evolved even further into a must have piece for rock and roll performers and fans everywhere, however as a print and not a skin. The Endangered Species Act of 1973 kept leopards from being slaughtered for their skin.

As time went on, leopard print became popular among women for representing not only their feminine sexuality, but also a more powerful symbol for them not so much being a predator, but them not being a prey in society. The leopard stood for independence, power, and courage, making an ideal symbol.

The Historic Costume and Textiles Collection is home to many clothing items such as hats, coats, bags, and shoes that have the leopard print or skin.

These shoes  are dated from 1965-1970. They are leopard fur skin pumps with a square toe and chunky heel.

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOURCES:

http://mentalfloss.com/article/72549/history-leopard-print

https://www.racked.com/2018/3/7/17053964/leopard-print-history

One thought on “Leopard Skins and Prints: The Good and the Bad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *