Fall Forage Management

Stephanie Karhoff, PhD, OSU Extension Agronomic Systems Field Specialist and Kyle Verhoff, AgNR Educator, Defiance County (previously published in the Ohio Country Journal)

Fall provides a great opportunity to scout and manage forage hay fields and pastures. In established stands, final harvest or intensive grazing should already have taken place to allow a fall rest period, except if planning to frost seed legumes. If needed, there is still time to soil sample and address winter annual weed concerns.

Soil test fields that will be seeded to forages next year. Apply lime as needed to adjust pH levels. Maintaining proper soil pH increases nutrient availability and will strengthen forage stands, decreasing their susceptibility to stresses like insects, diseases, or weed infestations. The 2020 Tri-State Field Crop Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn, Soybean, Wheat, and Alfalfa (Extension Bulletin 974) recommends consistently soil sampling every 3 to 4 years at no more than 25-acre samples. Lime applications are recommended when soil pH is two to three units below the desired level. In mineral soils (less than 20% organic matter) where the subsoil pH is less than 6.0, the target pH is Continue reading Fall Forage Management

Safe and effective use of cattle steroid ear implants

Jerad Jaborek, Michigan State University Extension

Steroidal ear implants are a growth promoting technology administered subcutaneously in the back of the middle one-third of the ear to increase growth, feed efficiency and carcass leanness of beef cattle.

As of July 1, 2023, label claims on cattle steroid implant products were updated by their respective manufacturing companies to meet a request from the FDA to provide clarification on reimplanting use within a production phase. There are currently 25 approved implants for use in beef production in the U.S.

Three main types of hormones are used in cattle ear implants: androgens, estrogens and progestins. Estrogens consist either of the naturally occurring estradiol-17β, a synthetic version called estradiol benzoate or an estrogen-like compound called zeranol. Estrogens can be used either alone or in combination with the naturally occurring progestin, progesterone, or a synthetic version of testosterone, trenbolone acetate. Implants vary in potency and are commonly classified as low-, medium- or high-potency implants depending on their active ingredients and the concentration of their active ingredients (Table 1). Less potent implants usually . . .

Continue reading Safe and effective use of cattle steroid ear implants

Reflecting on a Tough Couple of Months in the Cattle Markets

– Dr. Kenny Burdine, Extension Professor, Livestock Marketing, University of Kentucky

Feeder cattle prices have been trending down since mid-September and last week was especially frustrating for cattle producers. As I write this on the afternoon of Monday November 13, CME© feeder cattle futures are down $30-$40 per cwt from their September highs, depending on the contract month one is looking at. The chart below shows the change in closing prices from October 6th to November 10th (Friday). Cash feeder cattle prices have fallen during this time, but not by as much. Here in Kentucky, there also seems to be a lot of variation in local price levels, which suggests that markets have gotten pickier over the last several weeks. A full week of sales this week should tell us more as the markets process everything that has occurred recently.

While not scientific, it has been my observation that it is hard to build much momentum in feeder cattle markets this time of year. Prices tend to decline seasonally during fall, and the markets seem to seize negative news because of that. Swings in weather and temperatures, along with increased health issues as we move towards winter, don’t help either. There has been some Continue reading Reflecting on a Tough Couple of Months in the Cattle Markets

Continued Market Retreat

– Stephen R. Koontz, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University

Cattle markets continue the decline from September into November.  Much of this movement lower could and should have been anticipated.  The underlying supply and demand fundamentals did not support year-long and continuing higher movements in cattle prices.  Supplies are tightening and demand has been strong but the movement to record high prices is well in advance of that which can reasonably be supported by fundamentals.

Packer margins have spent much of the year at levels that are unlikely to cover costs – or much of costs – there may have been only a single month with some positive return.  Even with strong beef prices, fed cattle were relatively too strong.  The cash market has as of yet not followed live cattle futures lower.  But the underlying fundamentals make that likely.  The boxed beef composite value has held at levels modestly above $3 per pound.  It will also be interesting to watch the beef market react to holiday demands.  For example, do Continue reading Continued Market Retreat

Presynchronization and Improving Fertility of Beef Cows

The second session of the 2023 Ohio State University Extension Beef Team’s Virtual Beef School was broadcast via ZOOM on February 8th. The evening’s program focused on improving fertility and getting cows bred. More specifically, to lead off OSU Grad Student Alex Crist shared her research during her presentation entitled Presynchronization and Improving Fertility of Beef Cows. Following that OSU Extension Educator Dean Kreager presented on Estrus Synchronization While Utilizing Natural Service. Listen in here as Garth Ruff introduces Alex Crist and her presentation Presynchronization and Improving Fertility of Beef Cows during the first segment of the evening’s program.

EDITOR’s NOTE: Dean Kreager’s presentation entitled Estrus Synchronization While Utilizing Natural Service that followed can be found on YouTube linked here.

A valid veterinarian-client-patient relationship is key to successful cattle health

Jerad Jaborek, Michigan State University Extension

Photo by R. Anson Eaglin, USDA, Public Domain.

By now, you have heard of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Veterinary Medicine’s (FDA-CVM) change of purchasing medically important over-the-counter antimicrobials for animals to now requiring a veterinary prescription as of June 11, 2023. This is one of many regulatory changes implemented regarding administering antimicrobials to food producing animals over the last decade due to the growing concerns of metaphylactic treatment of food-producing animals and antimicrobial resistance. As part of FDA-CVM’s 2012/2013 release of guidance for industry (GFI) #209, “The Judicious Use of Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing Animals,” the FDA-CVM aimed to:

  1. Limit medically important antimicrobial drugs to uses in food-producing animals that are considered necessary for assuring animal health.
  2. Limit medically important antimicrobial drugs to uses in food-producing animals that include veterinary oversight or consultation.

This led to the . . .

Continue reading A valid veterinarian-client-patient relationship is key to successful cattle health

PRF Trends

– Matthew Diersen, Risk & Business Management Specialist, Ness School of Management & Economics, South Dakota State University

This insurance product is gaining popularity.

Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage Rainfall Index insurance (PRF) continues to gain popularity. PRF is insurance against low precipitation that may be correlated with reduced feed production. PRF has subsidized premiums that cover either haying or grazing with a scaler to adjust productivity for a specific sub-county region. The deadline to purchase the coverage for calendar year 2024 is December 1, 2023. Here are some trends related to this product.

Nationally, the acres insured by PRF have grown rapidly from about 50 million acres in 2016 to almost 300 million acres in 2023. The level is beginning to approach the upper bound for all pasture and forage acres, which was less than 500 million acres according to the 2017 Census of Agriculture. For 2023 the coverage or insured amount was just below $6 billion. The acres covered are Continue reading PRF Trends

Why is This Time Different?

– James Mitchell, Livestock Marketing Specialist, University of Arkansas

A lot has been said about tight cattle supplies in 2023. The January 2023 Cattle Inventory report estimated total cattle supplies at 89.27 million head, down 3 percent year over year but still 1 percent above the previous low in 2014. The result of tight cattle supplies across all sectors of the beef cattle industry has been historically high prices. Through October, prices for a 400-500-pound steer calf in Arkansas average $269 per hundredweight. This is more than $90 per hundredweight higher than in October 2022 when prices averaged $177 per hundredweight. Prices are high across weight classes in Arkansas. In October, 500-600-pound stocker cattle prices averaged $252 per hundredweight, and 700-800-pound feeder cattle prices averaged $220 per hundredweight, 52 percent and 47 percent higher year over year, respectively.

It is hard not to compare the current situation to 2014, when total cattle inventories were 88.24 million head. Cattle prices in 2014 set records. However, many of us are also keenly aware of 2015 and 2016. Herd expansion occurred rapidly. By January 2016, total cattle inventories were Continue reading Why is This Time Different?

The Cost of Money

– Dr. Andrew Griffith, Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee

The cost of borrowing money is becoming increasingly expensive in today’s environment. Many agricultural loan rates are between 7.5 percent and 8.5 percent, which is double what the rate was two years ago. The ratcheting up of rates has slowed tremendously, but that does not mean interest rates will not be increased in the coming years.

There are many operations that are not in a financial situation to reduce borrowing needs. However, there are some operations that could use some capital on hand for operating money and reduce borrowed capital. The use of available cash could reduce costs tremendously given the current interest rate environment. This statement is not to insinuate using all cash on hand in place of borrowing money, but rather to use a portion of the available capital to replace some borrowing.

For those who do not have cash on hand to replace a percentage of borrowed capital, it would be advantageous to establish a goal of putting back some cash in the coming years for times such as this.

Time to Plan a Winter Feeding Program

Garth Ruff, Beef Cattle Field Specialist, Ohio State University Extension (originally published in Ohio Farmer on-line)

Before buying hay, have it analyzed!

As we slide into autumn, harvest season is among us, and it is fairly dry here in Ohio’s cow country. Several folks are beginning to feed hay early, begging the question: Do you have enough hay? If not, what are your plans for winter feed?

Unlike most years the hay season across the southern two-thirds of Ohio was relatively timely. A large percentage of first cutting hay was made three to six weeks ahead of a “normal” schedule. While first cutting hay quality is better on average than the past few years, tonnage was reduced. Second and third cuttings of mixed grass hay were also fairly timely as the weather pattern turned dry in mid-August.

Being short on hay for the winter isn’t a make or break decision as there are several Continue reading Time to Plan a Winter Feeding Program