The Mirror Lake Restoration Project of Autumn semester 2017 has brought upon anger from the Ohio State community as a result of interrupting the holiday lights display and the traditional “Mirror Lake Jump”. While uniting the student body, the lake in general is looked upon as one of the standard landmarks that defined the university around the world.
With the shocking circumstances from the 2015 edition of the Jump, Ohio State has taken steps to make the area untouchable to the public during the time surrounding the once-annual tradition.
The university has started a project the will restore the draining issue with the lake that has caused issues in terms of maintenance over the past several years. Previous attempts to improve the process of flowing water came from the addition of the fountains, but constant issues with the lake’s bottom floor has led to the same results. Costs for the restoration project are slowly beginning to outweigh the normal costs to maintain the presence of the lake, and many people in the community are questioning the attempts to save the landscape.
Kellie Dempsey, a recent 2016 graduate of Ohio State, described how this stance should persuade the university officials.
“When the cost to save an item is more than the cost of regularly maintaining it, there needs to be a re-examination of the focus of the university,” said Dempsey. “There are many other ways they can funnel the money into other projects that will be more worthwhile in the long run.”
Dempsey feels that there are other issues going on around the campus that could use more attention.
“I know several former professors who have to start forming their resumes again due to a shortage in the department’s budget, and the money in the restoration budget would be more than enough to save their jobs,” said Dempsey. “At some point, the university needs to realize they operate for the betterment of their people and not just their materialistic luxuries.”
The month of November signifies the shift into late fall and the preparation period for the winter months ahead. During this period, staff at the Ohio State University begins prepping the campus for the holiday season. In usual fashion, one if the tasks is the famous lighting of the Mirror Lake area with Christmas lights creating an aurora similar to the Columbus Zoo Lights attraction.
This, along with several other reasons, have made the area a prime study spot during this time of year in advance of final exams rapidly approaching.
For fellow Ohio State junior Amine Lehachi, the current construction cuts into this steady pastime.
“With the weather cooperating with us this year, this would have been a prime time to enjoy the classic scenery while preparing for my exams,” said Lehachi. “[The construction] really dampens the culture of campus because this lake means more to us than just a now-meaningless attempt to jump into it.”
Like any controversial event, there are different view points and other topics that tie into the overall situation. In the case of the restoration project, the key is to eliminate a potential “eye sore” in the opinion of Ohio State head officials. To a select group of students, the project has acted in a counterproductive manner.
Michael Shaver, a current Ohio State junior, spoke in a short video about her view of how the construction creates an unwanted image for the community.
Shaver finishes with a point demonstrated by many students every year. “At the end of the day, all we want to do is to be able to take pride in our campus’ image,” said Shaver.
Most videos that commemorate the campus show seasonal scenes of the lake area. Not being able to enjoy the area during the holiday season eliminates the ability for outsiders.
Like every controversy that can be imagined, there is a contingent of people on the opposite side of the opinions. The crowd that supports the restoration project believes in the university’s statements regarding the possible outcomes of ignoring the leaking issues. The issues have been displayed by construction companies in the past showing possible damage to surrounding buildings.
Hassan Chaudary, a sophomore in his second year living on south campus, explained why he prefers the safe approach.
“If you eliminate the threat of great disasters, then the project should have been an easy decision,” said Chaudary. “Living in a south campus dorm that could be harmed by a system failure is very scary and anything threatening the safety of students should be immediately addressed like this project.”
Both sides of the argument have been clearly heard through social media profiles and campus movements. The project is still in the early stages, and it will be a while until we can gather a sense on the likely results. With such a strong and connected community, there will be ways to ease the tension of those against the decision and find peace in enjoying new areas of the campus in the meantime.
The holiday season display may have to wait a year, but the prospective improvements to the area will have the potential to satisfy all Buckeyes during 2017 and beyond.

